Ohio suspends well operations after series of small quakes

Related Topics

CLEVELAND | Sun Jan 1, 2012 7:16pm EST

CLEVELAND (Reuters) - Ohio has suspended operations at five deep-well hazardous fluid disposal sites after a series of 11 earthquakes in Youngstown last year including one on Saturday with a magnitude of 4.0, officials said on Sunday.

The Ohio Department of Natural Resources said it was halting operations at five Mahoning County wells owned by Northstar Disposal Services LLC as a precaution, citing concerns of a possible link between well activity and the quakes.

"We are being overly cautious in order to ensure public safety in asking the company to halt disposal injections at one site on Friday and then asking for a halt to any injections in a five-mile radius Saturday," Ohio Department of Natural Resources deputy director Andy Ware told Reuters.

"Our geologist would say there is a strong chance there is a fault line very close to the site of the well," Ware said, adding the department was concerned that pressure from the fluid disposal could be affecting a previously unknown fault line.

Earthquakes induced by human activity have been documented in a few locations in the United States, Japan and Canada, according to the U.S. Geological Survey web site. The largest and best known resulted from fluid injection at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal near Denver, Colorado, where in 1967 a 5.5 magnitude earthquake followed a series of smaller quakes.

Ware said Northstar won the right to drill in the area in March 2010 and began drilling in mid-summer. The injection disposal started in December 2010 and the first earthquake occurred in 2011. A representative for Northstar could not be reached for comment on Sunday.

Ohio Governor John Kasich felt the move was important to "quickly ensure the safety of the public," spokesman Robert Nichols said.

"We fully expect to be criticized for overreacting on this, but we are okay with that," Nichols said.

Earthquakes are not common in Youngstown, and seismic records going back to 1980 show no reports of earthquakes prior to the series of quakes last year. A 2.1 magnitude quake, the first of 11 in 2011, was reported on March 17. More were reported in August, September, October, November and December.

Ware said that after a 2.7 magnitude quake was reported on December 24, Northstar Disposal Services voluntarily lowered the pressure at one well, known as Northstar No. 1.

At 3:05 p.m. on New Year's Eve, a 4.0 earthquake was reported, "causing the Ohio Department of Resources to recommend all wells in the area stop operations," Ware said.

After the initial spate of earthquakes in the area, four more monitors were set up in the proximity of the first well to get more data on the source of the seismic activity.

There are 177 disposal wells currently in operation in Ohio. The Mahoning County well is 9,000 feet deep and is used to dispose hazardous fluids, injecting fluid that cannot be disposed of in landfills into sandstone well below groundwater level.

An internal briefing was scheduled for later on Sunday, and Ware could not say when or if the wells would resume operations. Authorities said there may be a change in how the wells operate.

"That is one of the things that would be discussed, possibly plugging the well to a certain level." Ware said. "We will continue to monitor and have our geologists monitor the data."

(Writing and reporting by Kim Palmer; Editing by Mary Wisniewski and Cynthia Johnston)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
sjtom wrote:
This is merely the tip of the ice berg. When all is said and done the fracking nightmare will make Love Canal resemble a leaky water pistol.

Jan 02, 2012 12:57am EST  --  Report as abuse
PubliusVal wrote:
“Our geologist would say there is a strong chance there is a fault line very close to the site of the well,” Ware said, adding the department was concerned that pressure from the fluid disposal could be affecting a previously unknown fault line.”

These guys know and have had it proved to them that deep injection can cause earthquakes. They prefer to hopefully hit a fault so get more poison into the ground. It also proves they don’t seismically check their drill sites. If seismic were required and permits refused based on faults found, they would be hard pressed ever to get a permit. In recognized continental drift theory, there is crustal movement in all directions including up and down. There is no such thing as un-fractured beds and under lying unbroken strata contrary to the glitzy artist renditions put out by extractors.

This pointless race to ‘drill, baby drill” is not an organized energy management plan to keep the U.S. supplied with fuel, it is a race to make all the money possible before markets in fossil fuel collapse from advances in electrical power storage in the thousands of megawatts ranges.

Even now, fuel export has jumped to the #1 spot on national exports.

Jan 02, 2012 12:59am EST  --  Report as abuse
GSRyder wrote:
The US Army corp of Engineers, in it’s Limitations warnings regarding deep well injections. Posts first, No 1……”Injections will not be used for hazzardous waste disposal in any areas where seismic activity could potentially occur.” This is a bit more than “potentially occuring” in my humble opinion. Also the Ohio incidents are not unique. Why let science, common sence, or the Corp of Engineers influence any decisions, regarding unknowm pitfalls. OUR money grubbing congress listens to these guys “CoE”, when human lives are in the balance. Corp data and guide lines are of no concern when there is CASH to be made.

Jan 02, 2012 9:26am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.