Interactive

Oil gains a second day after EU reaches Iran sanctions

A view of a drilling rig and distant production platform in the Soldado Field off Trinidad's southwest coast, September 10, 2011. REUTERS/Andrea De Silva

A view of a drilling rig and distant production platform in the Soldado Field off Trinidad's southwest coast, September 10, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Andrea De Silva

NEW YORK | Wed Jan 4, 2012 3:44pm EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Brent crude rose for the second straight session Wednesday, closing at a seven-week high after the European Union reached a preliminary agreement to ban imports of Iranian crude, escalating tensions in the West's standoff with Tehran that has gripped oil markets for weeks.

European diplomats said they had a preliminary agreement but had yet to decide when an embargo would be put in place. The news sent Brent crude up nearly $2 a barrel.

A senior Iranian official responded that the OPEC member already has alternative outlets available to maintain its 2.3 million barrels per day (bpd) of oil exports, including sending more crude to China, the world's No. 2 consumer.

The tensions stemming from Iran's nuclear ambitions have supported oil prices in recent weeks. Tehran last week threatened to cut off oil flows through the strategic Strait of Hormuz in the event of an oil embargo. About 35 percent of all seaborne oil moves through the strait.

"India, China and some other Asia countries may end up getting a reduced price on Iranian oil and that could be good for their economies, but European countries will have to find other sources," said Gene McGillian, analyst for Tradition Energy in Stamford, Connecticut.

In London, ICE Brent February crude settled at $113.70 a barrel, gaining $1.57 or 1.4 percent, the highest settlement since November 11. In two days, front-month Brent has risen $6.32, or 5.89 percent, the most for two days since October 6.

U.S. February crude settled up 26 cents or 0.25 percent at $103.22 a barrel, highest since May 10. U.S. crude has advanced $4.39 or 4.4 percent in two days, the most for two days since December 21.

Brent's premium against U.S. crude widened to $10.48, after closing at $9.17 on Tuesday.

Brent trading volume shot up 55 percent above its 30-day average while U.S. crude rose 17 percent from its 30-day average, according to Reuters data.

Iran supplies about 450,000 barrels per day to EU member states, making the bloc collectively the second-largest market for Iranian oil after China.

While oil markets braced for a potential supply problem, a U.S. Treasury official said the United States believes Tehran's oil revenues can be choked off through a well-timed, phased-in curtailment of purchases that will not disrupt global oil markets. New U.S. sanctions signed into law on New Year's Eve envision such a phased-in approach, the official said.

SUPPLY RISKS, U.S. INVENTORY DATA

Potential supply disruptions in Africa and central Asia also supported prices.

Nigeria's main trade unions called for a national strike and mass demonstrations to shut down sectors such as oil production starting from Monday, unless the government restores a fuel subsidy it scrapped at the start of the week.

In Kazakhstan, President Nursultan Nazarbayev extended until January 31 a state of emergency in the western oil city of Zhanaozen, where at least 16 people were killed last month.

In the United States, traders were awaiting the weekly inventory report from the industry group American Petroleum Institute scheduled after the close of oil markets.

An expanded Reuters poll of analysts forecast that crude stocks fell 200,000 barrels in the week to December 30. Distillate stocks rose 800,000 barrels and gasoline stocks gained 1.3 million barrels, the poll also showed.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration will follow with its weekly report on Thursday at 11 a.m. EST (1600 GMT).

(Additional reporting by Robert Gibbons and Matthew Robinson in New York, Simon Falush in London, Florence Tan in Singapore. Editing by Dave Gregorio.)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
ExRepublican2 wrote:
Since there is no disruption to any oil supply, other than words between to countries, the oil speculators are at it again. Fear mongers controlling Brent crude or Brent is falsely making assumptions to an oil disruption, which will only set the US economy backwards and screw Wall Street’s recovery. The news media is blind when towns and states give big businesses property tax breaks (tax exemption) for 5 to 10 years just to acquire them. That is wrong and should be illegal. After these new companies establish themselves in those towns, they end up hiring very few locals’ vs. relocating their faithful following employees to the new state/town. But it gets worst, after their tax exemption of five or ten years expires, they threaten to move away if the towns/states don’t extend their tax exemption. Tax breaks for big businesses need to be outlaw by every State in the Union. This is the only way to break the no tax cycle of businesses, who are legally black mailing states and towns with their perfected method! Also, CEOs, managers and corporations frequently lay employees off to make their profits seem larger (using those salaries from their laid off employees to inflate/boost profits) to acquire an end of year bonus. The Insurance Companies started this yearly patterned unemployment cycle method of lay offs. And, whom do those company shareholders hire for CEOs? Former/Ex Bankers and we all know what they did to the US economy in 2008 – present. This insidious cycle of unemployment won’t be broken until corrupt politicians are voted out of power and new laws banning tax exemptions and severe penalties for unjustified patterned lay offs are passed into law. There should be severe penalties assessed to Big Oil companies jack up prices caused by falsifying oil supply disruptions when it hasn’t happened at all.

Jan 04, 2012 2:20am EST  --  Report as abuse
kev20 wrote:
Oil will always continue to rise in price. It is are limited resource, we shouldn’t allow energy pushers to control our politics.

Jan 04, 2012 6:04am EST  --  Report as abuse
DetroitNative wrote:
Speculators gone wild! These people shouldn’t be allowed to bid on contracts without taking physical possession!

Jan 04, 2012 8:15am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.