Activists board Japanese whaling vessel-Sea Shepherd

SYDNEY Sat Jan 7, 2012 9:18pm EST

SYDNEY Jan 8 (Reuters) - Three Australian environmental activists boarded a Japanese whaling vessel on Sunday to protest against Japan's annual whale cull in the Antarctic, anti-whaling group Sea Shepherd said in a statement.

The three activists from the Australian group Forest Rescue boarded the ship early on Sunday with assistance from Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, whose ships are trying to tail the Japanese whaling fleet as it heads towards the Southern Ocean.

The activists had not been returned and were "prisoners now detained on a Japanese whaler", Sea Shepherd said.

Forest Rescue is an environmental group which specialises in direct action, usually to prevent the logging of forests.

A group spokesman, Michael Montgomery, confirmed the incident and said the action was to demand the departure of the Japanese whalers from Australian waters.

"We don't need to kill these beautiful creatures any more," he told Reuters.

Sea Shepherd said the activists came from shore in a boat, which approached the vessel Shonan Maru 2 in the dark, with assistance from two Sea Shepherd boats.

"The three negotiated their way past the razor wire and spikes and over the rails of the Japanese whaling vessel," the group said in its statement.

"They are being held in Australian territorial waters by an invading Japanese vessel containing armed Japanese military personnel."

They carried with them a message reading: "Return us to shore in Australia and then remove yourself from our waters."

Whaling was banned under a 1986 moratorium, but Japan continues to hunt hundreds of whales annually under a loophole that allows whaling for "scientific" purposes.

The Institute of Cetacean Research, the Japanese body that coordinates the hunt, had no immediate comment on its website about the latest incident. (Sydney Newsroom +612 6273 2730) (Editing by Robert Birsel)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
DaveRideough wrote:
Details are still fuzzy. The activist groups have stated the location the boarding supposedly took place, both in miles from the coast and in latitude/longitude, and the two don’t match up. One puts the boarding just northwest of Bunbury but the other puts it just west of Perth. More importantly, one is in Australian territorial waters, while the other is only in its contiguous zone. This means the difference between the Shonan Maru being in Australian jurisdiction or Japanese jurisdiction.

Jan 08, 2012 4:09am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.