Editor's Choice

Doomsday Clock a minute closer to midnight

Related Topics

Leonard Reiser, chairman of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists and member of the Manhattan Project adjusts the Doomsday Clock. REUTERS

Leonard Reiser, chairman of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists and member of the Manhattan Project adjusts the Doomsday Clock.

Credit: Reuters

Tue Jan 10, 2012 7:36pm EST

(Reuters) - The symbolic Doomsday Clock calculated by a group of scientists was moved a minute closer to midnight on Tuesday, with the group citing inadequate progress on nuclear weapons reduction and climate change.

The clock was moved to five minutes to midnight, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists said, the first adjustment since the beginning of 2010, when it was moved back one minute to six minutes from midnight -- or "doomsday".

"Two years ago, it appeared that world leaders might address the truly global threats that we face. In many cases, that trend has not continued or been reversed," the group said in a statement.

The Bulletin (www.thebulletin.org) is a periodical founded in 1945 by University of Chicago scientists who had helped develop the first atomic weapons in the Manhattan Project.

They created the Doomsday Clock two years later to symbolize how close humanity was to self-annihilation, with an initial setting of seven minutes to midnight.

Initially the clock was focused on nuclear war, but it has been broadened in recent years as the scientists, who include a range of Nobel laureates, added other risks to humanity.

The scientists said world leaders had failed to sustain the progress in nuclear disarmament that had seen them move the hands back on the clock two years ago.

As well, the major global challenge now was a warmer climate that threatens to bring droughts, famine, water scarcity and rising seas, said Allison Macfarlane, an associated professor at George Mason University near Washington, who chairs the group's committee that helps set the clock.

"The global community may be near a point of no return in efforts to prevent catastrophe from changes in Earth's atmosphere," Macfarlane said in the statement.

The last time the group moved the hands closer to midnight was in 2007, by two minutes due to a North Korean nuclear weapon test, Iranian nuclear ambitions and a renewed U.S. emphasis at the time of the military utility of nuclear weapons.

The closest the clock ever came to midnight was 1953, the year of the first test of a hydrogen bomb by the United States.

(Writing by Rodney Joyce; editing by Dan Burns)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
GRAZOR wrote:
yea right! A clock that can have hands that move in both directions is absolutely NO indication what-so ever of what is happening in the real world time-line. Today it is 5 minutes, next it could be 2 minutes in either direction by the experts,,,, if you really want to get the straight prediction, study the weather forecast from the so-called experts,,,, great comparison.

Jan 10, 2012 8:03pm EST  --  Report as abuse
steveorlando wrote:
this seems to be more of a political manuver , seeing that the US republicans are ringing the fear alarm over uranium enrichment in the middle east… is this just another invisable WMD ploy to protect corperate interest in the middle east??

Jan 10, 2012 9:23pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Randy549 wrote:
I think that adding global warming into the criteria for setting the clock reduces its credibility and impact, and will make people treat its (legitimate) focus on nuclear war catastrophe less seriously. A shame.

Jan 10, 2012 9:56pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.