Growing wealth divide puts globalization at risk

LONDON Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:17am EST

People walk past a beggar in front of a Louis Vuitton shop in downtown Florence November 20,2011.  REUTERS/Giampiero Sposito

People walk past a beggar in front of a Louis Vuitton shop in downtown Florence November 20,2011.

Credit: Reuters/Giampiero Sposito

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - A backlash against rising inequality - evident from the Occupy movement to the Arab Spring - risks derailing the advance of globalization and represents a threat to economies worldwide, according to the World Economic Forum.

Severe income disparity and precarious government finances rank as the biggest economic threats facing the world, according to the group's 2012 Global Risks report released on Wednesday.

The 60-page analysis of 50 risks over the next decade precedes the World Economic Forum's (WEF) annual meeting in two weeks' time in the Swiss ski resort of Davos, and paints a bleak picture of an increasingly uncertain world.

Over the past four decades, Davos, which brings together politicians, central bankers and business leaders, has become a byword for globalization. Now confidence about the steady gains from the onward march of the global marketplace is faltering.

Rising youth unemployment, a retirement crisis among pensioners dependent on debt-burdened states and a yawning wealth gap have sown the "seeds of dystopia," according to the report, based on a survey of 469 experts and industry leaders.

For the first time in generations, people no longer believe their children will grow up to have a better standard of living.

"It needs immediate political attention, otherwise the political rhetoric that responds to this social unease will involve nationalism, protectionism and rolling back the globalization process," said Lee Howell, the WEF managing director responsible for the report.

The unsustainable level of government debt in many countries had already been highlighted as a top threat in the previous two WEF risk reports but the chronic nature of fiscal deficits means the issue remains centre stage.

"We're seeing governments kicking the can down the road and not trying to get their hands on it," Howell said.

Since last January, the euro zone's debt crisis has spread and deepened - toppling governments in Greece and Italy - while the United States has lost its triple-A credit rating, after failing to stabilize its debt position.

There will be a greater focus than ever in Davos this year on the failures of the modern market economy, including discussion on the uncertain future of capitalism, a subject that would have got short shrift in the years before the financial crisis.


In an increasingly interconnected world, the WEF report also highlights the risks posed by cyberattacks against individuals, corporations and nations.

"The Arab Spring demonstrated the power of interconnected communications services to drive personal freedom, yet the same technology facilitated riots in London," said Steve Wilson, chief risk officer for general insurance at Zurich Financial Services.

U.S. President Barack Obama's defense strategy this month showed cyber warfare to be a growing focus for governments, while companies got a wake-up call last April when hackers stole Sony Playstation online data for millions of users.

"It's completely mind-boggling how complex the world is becoming and it is hard to understand the risks that come from that," Wilson said.

Other threats identified in the 2012 report include the risk that financial and other regulatory systems designed to safeguard the modern world may no longer be up to the job, as well as rising greenhouse gas emissions and looming water shortages.

Governments and corporations must also stay abreast of a host of "X" factors - emerging concerns with still unknown consequences - such as the risk of a volcanic winter or a major accident involving new technology, such as genetically modified organisms or nanotechnology.

Full report at: here

(Reporting by Ben Hirschler; editing by Janet McBride)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (22)
BCerentano wrote: is fighting back against the rampant greed of Corporate America.

Jan 11, 2012 9:38am EST  --  Report as abuse
William78 wrote:
It appears that the wealthiest few (Captian’s of Industry and Finance) of this world who’ve been so supportive of what THEY CONSIDER Adam Smith’s brand of Capitalism, may want to revist how they constantly rely on the Rational Man’s more IRRATIONAL tendancies to support their questionable business practices.

Corporations have been dismissing the notion of the Public’s health and well-being in favor of profit for many decades now. The people WILL learn from those tricks and profits will subside.

Only in fiction will the Wealthy Few continue to “globalize” at the expense of the 99+% of the world’s population. The 99+% are VERY rational people who will not be placed into economic slavery for the sake of a larger, more rewarding economy.

If the Wealthiest Few truly wish to “globalize” the world economies, they have a great deal to learn about the fuel that will fire said economy. Namely the PEOPLE.

At this point, “globalization” is no more attainable than is World Peace… possibly due to how much the Wealthiest Few gain from regional conflict.

Jan 11, 2012 9:58am EST  --  Report as abuse
Gordon2352 wrote:
You have the “cart before the horse”.

It is “globalization” itself that has created the massive inequalities in wealth and has put the world at risk.

The ugly truth is that “globalization” has completely outstripped any laws which would normally govern such behavior in a single nation, and thus society is reverting to a “survival of the fittest” mentality.

THIS is the underlying problem of the so-called “global economy”.

It is destroying the world we live in — all of us, at every level of society, and must be substantially reduced by laws and regulations in order for us to survive.

Jan 11, 2012 10:10am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.