Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by tornado

A huge tornado tears through the Oklahoma City suburb of Moore, killing dozens.  Slideshow 

Photo

Nuclear tsunami wall

Safety upgrades designed to prevent a repeat of the Fukushima disaster.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Clinton slams Iran nuclear move, urges serious talks

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Wed Jan 11, 2012 3:05am EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Tuesday Iran's decision to enrich uranium near the city of Qom was "especially troubling" and urged Tehran to return to serious talks with Western powers over its atomic program.

"This step once again demonstrates the Iranian regime's blatant disregard for its responsibilities and that the country's growing isolation is self-inflicted," Clinton said in a statement.

Clinton's strongly worded comments repeated U.S. concerns over Iran's announcement that it had started enrichment at the underground Fordow bunker near Qom, which came amid rising tensions between Tehran and western powers.

Iran denies Western suspicions that its nuclear program has military goals, saying it is for purely peaceful purposes.

"The circumstances surrounding this latest action are especially troubling," Clinton said.

"There is no plausible justification for this production. Such enrichment brings Iran a significant step closer to having the capability to produce weapons-grade highly enriched uranium."

Clinton rejected Iran's assertion that it needed to enrich uranium to produce fuel for a medical research reactor, saying Western powers had offered alternatives means of obtaining such fuel but their offers had been rejected by Tehran.

The United States imposed additional sanctions on Iran last month and the European Union is expected to agree on a ban on imports of Iranian crude oil later this month.

As sanctions squeeze, Iran has threatened to shut the Strait of Hormuz, the outlet for 40 percent of the world's traded oil.

At the same time, it has called for fresh nuclear talks with the permanent members of the U.N. Security Council and Germany, a group known as the "P5+1," which have been stalled for a year.

Calling on Iran to immediately halt uranium enrichment, Clinton also urged Tehran to return to talks with the P5+1 "prepared to engage seriously on its nuclear program."

"We reaffirm that our overall goal remains a comprehensive, negotiated solution," Clinton said.

Daryl Kimball, executive director of the nonprofit Arms Control Association, welcomed Clinton's fresh call for a negotiated solution.

"The United States and its 'P5+1' partners - China, France, Germany, Russia, and the United Kingdom - should continue to prepare for and more energetically pursue additional talks with Iran and continue to highlight constructive proposals they are prepared to discuss," Kimball said in an emailed comment.

"A near-term goal should be to test Iran's recent publicly stated offer to halt uranium enrichment to 20 percent levels if it could have access to fuel for its Tehran Research Reactor," he added.

"A stockpile of 20 percent would allow Iran to shorten its time frame to produce weapons, if it chose to do so," Kimball said. "We should not forgo any realistic opportunities to reduce that risk."

(Reporting By Andrew Quinn; Editing by Todd Eastham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
DALE31 wrote:
HOW NAIVE IS HILLARY CLINTON?
Having talks with the 5+1 will only buy time for Iran to build their bomb. Notice I said Bomb and not a missle delivery system. Everyone seems to be focused on a long range missle whereas it would be much easier to do a suitcase bomb or a small portable bomb which can be strategically placed.
***Iran is NOT isolated as Hillary says…as long as China and Russia are doing business as usual with Iran they are going to make money to build their weapons and support their terrorism.
***Obama is too worried about his political situation about what if Iran blocked the Straits of Hormuz or if oil prices skyrocketed and what happens to the economy. What happened in doing the right thing? What happens if Iran gets a bomb? What do you think will happen then? Why is A-JAD so chummy with Venezuela? Why is there unsatisfactory security at the American ports? HHHHMMMM! Remember the movie, “The Sum of All Fears”? Could this happen in America? Maybe?
***Doing the right hting always has a cost. But doing the right thing now is better than the alternatives down the road.

Jan 10, 2012 10:29pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Marcus1000 wrote:
I guess we’ll get to really do something when yhey drop a nuke on Israel. I wonder what China will do, considering Iran hates Buddists as much as Christians and they’re a lot closer and there’s more of em. Iran is doomed!

Jan 10, 2012 11:09pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.