Iran says not storing oil in Gulf due to sanctions

Related Topics

TEHRAN | Sat Jan 14, 2012 6:34am EST

TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran has not stored oil on tankers in the Gulf, and its crude exports have not been disrupted due to mounting international pressure over its disputed nuclear program, an oil official told the semi-official Mehr news agency on Saturday.

On Tuesday shipping sources told Reuters the volume of Iranian crude oil stored at sea had risen to as much as 8 million barrels and was likely to increase further as the Islamic Republic struggles with sanctions and a seasonal refinery slowdown.

"There has been no disruption in Iran's crude exports through the Persian Gulf ... We have not stored oil in the Gulf because of sanctions as some foreign media reported," Pirouz Mousavi told Mehr.

"We do not have even one drop of oil (stored) in the Persian Gulf ... Iran's oil exports are taking place based on the OPEC's policies."

Iran, OPEC's second-largest oil producer after Saudi Arabia with output of about 3.5 million barrels per day, faces trade hurdles over its nuclear program, which the United States and its allies say is aimed at building bombs.

Iran says it needs nuclear technology to generate electricity.

European Union countries have agreed in principle to embargo imports of Iranian as part of the latest Western efforts to step up heat on Tehran.

Temporary storage of crude on tankers at sea has been an effective means in recent years for Iran to hold cargoes until sales can be made while not interrupting oil field production.

EU countries have proposed "grace periods" on existing contracts of one to 12 months to allow companies to find alternative suppliers before implementing an embargo.

Shipping sources said the widening sanctions were likely to deter most international ship owners from engaging in deals in which Iran can hire tankers, compounding its logistic problems.

Iran has threatened to block the vital oil shipping route of the Strait of Hormuz in the Gulf if sanctions imposed on its oil exports.

(Writing By Mitra Amiri, editing by Jane Baird)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
acin2012 wrote:
Nobody has ever addressed the most obvious question here. Why do you suppose Iran, a country rich in petrochemical reserves, “needs” Nuclear power to generate electricity? This is an obvious lie. They don’t “need” Nuclear power, they have enough oil and gas to power hundreds of power plants.

Jan 14, 2012 7:20am EST  --  Report as abuse
WNS818 wrote:
After spending abit of time with Chemical engineers, and even a nuclear technician, I believe that nuclear energy is the cleanest and cheapest way to produce energy.

Iran is correct and justified in their quest for this clean energy source. If so many countries around the world are permitted to have nuclear, many of those currently, and recently, and intenting to be, at war, like Israel, and the US, Russia and North Korea, and India, and France and Pakistan and China…….so forth….

…..so why discriminate against Iran? Who is currently not at war or has any known war plans…ah!!!They are next door to Israel who epouse themselves as the centre of the universe.

The mistakes in history regarding nuclear power disasters have been at a human level.

Jan 14, 2012 9:12am EST  --  Report as abuse
Nostredame wrote:
The driving force behind the subsidy is the fear of Iran developing and deploying, or threatening to deploy nuclear weapons. If the concerns about Iran’s nuclear aspirations are valid then it would be shortsighted to dismiss the implementation of the sanctions for the benefit of short-term economic gain.

Jan 14, 2012 11:19am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.