Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Photo

Ethiopia's salt trails

For centuries merchants have traveled to Ethiopia to collect salt from the surface of the vast desert basin.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Washington state gay marriage proposal gets strong support

Related Topics

SEATTLE | Fri Jan 13, 2012 10:11pm EST

SEATTLE (Reuters) - A bipartisan group of lawmakers on Friday introduced a bill to legalize same sex marriage in Washington state, which gay rights groups hope will be the next state to approve nuptials after two-term governor Christine Gregoire announced her support.

The bill was introduced in the Democrat-controlled Senate and has the backing of 21 Democrats and two Republicans, just two votes short of a majority in the 49-member chamber.

It may take months to come to a vote in the Senate because of public hearings and committee debate.

If successful, it would then go to a vote in the state House, where Democrats have a larger majority, before heading to Gregoire, who drew national attention recently by announcing her support of same sex marriage.

"It is time for marriage equality," Gregoire, a Democrat in her final year in office, said in her state of the state address Tuesday.

"Let's tell the children of our same-sex couples that their parents' relationship is equal to all others in the state," she added.

Last year, New York state became the most populous state to legalize same sex marriage, delighting gay rights advocates. Five other states allow it: Massachusetts, Connecticut, Vermont, New Hampshire and Iowa. Gay marriage is also legal in the District of Columbia.

Some 40 state explicitly ban gay marriage.

A University of Washington poll of state voters last October found that 44 percent of respondents said gays and lesbians should have the right to marry.

It found that 22 percent said they should have the same legal rights as married couples - although their partnerships should not be defined as marriage - while 17 percent said there should be no legal recognition for same sex partnerships.

Although Democrats hold majorities in both of Washington state's chambers, a bill is not certain to pass because some conservative Democrats have sided with Republicans on the issue.

The drive's principal sponsor, Democratic Sen. Ed Murray, 56, remains cautious about the bill's chances, even with bipartisan support from Republican Senators Steve Litzow and Cheryl Pflug.

"Our gay and lesbian civil rights bill, which took 29 years to pass (in 2006), was always one vote short and I believe this situation is pretty much the same," said Murray, a gay man who hopes to wed his long-term partner in the state.

"We are grandchildren of people who immigrated and homesteaded this state," he said. "We hope that after 20 years of basically being engaged together that we would be able to legally marry in our native state."

But opponents of same-sex marriage aren't taking any chances.

Stephen Pidgeon, 57, an Everett attorney, has filed a ballot initiative with the secretary of state's office to define marriage as between one man and one woman.

To qualify for the November ballot, his measure must collect at least 241,153 signatures of registered voters by the close of normal business hours July 6.

"That's a pretty large number, but we will succeed," Pidgeon said, adding that he plans to start collecting signatures next week. "We expect a lot of participation from the churches."

(Editing By Tim Gaynor)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
Jtruth wrote:
Gay Marriage has been and always will be the wrong thing to support in any way. Not only is the life style totally immoral and perverse.
It is most unfortunate that our country is continuing to slide down the scale of social norms.

Our President is a Muslim and from the Middle East. Being a veteran I know that Gay lifestyle is not tolerated in many parts of the world.

We should not support Gay marriage period. Gay’s already have all the rights of all other US citizens. They do not need (special rights) that they seek.

Jan 13, 2012 10:41pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Republic84 wrote:
Jtruth – as a veteran you should understand the need for every US citizen every human to be treated in an equal manner. Clearly your desire to segregate a large portion of society shows that whatever war you participated in meant nothing and those brave soles that parished during such also meant nothing to you. You are correct about one thing, our nation is heading slowly in a new direction, we are headed toward a time when hate mongering bigots such as yourself will no longer be tolerated. There is nothing immoral or perverse about love between two individuals. Hopefully one day whatever injustice that has caused you to hate your fellow man so much will be resolved.

Jan 14, 2012 12:21am EST  --  Report as abuse
wrpa wrote:
History reveals a slow, steady, unstoppable march to affirm civil rights. We see it in the US in the end of discrimination against women, followed by the end of discrimination against minorities. Today, we see it in the Arab Spring. Today, in the US, there is a groundswell against discrimination against gay and lesbian people. No doubt, someday, the tide will wash away this vestige of discrimination. Those who will have championed that cause will be remembered with accolades. Those who clung to their bigotry will forever be remembered as the Strom Thurmunds of their day.

Jan 14, 2012 9:08am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.