Iran says ready to discuss "any issues" with IAEA

Related Topics

Iran's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) ambassador Ali Asghar Soltanieh arrives for a Board of Governors meeting at the IAEA headquarters in Vienna, March 7, 2011.  REUTERS/Heinz-Peter Bader

Iran's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) ambassador Ali Asghar Soltanieh arrives for a Board of Governors meeting at the IAEA headquarters in Vienna, March 7, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Heinz-Peter Bader

VIENNA | Tue Jan 17, 2012 12:03pm EST

VIENNA (Reuters) - Iran said on Tuesday it was open to discuss "any issues" in rare talks this month with the U.N. nuclear watchdog, which wants Tehran to address mounting concerns that it may be trying to develop nuclear weapons capability.

With the Islamic state facing intensifying sanctions aimed at its oil exports, a senior Iranian official said a high-level team from the U.N. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) would hold three days of talks in Tehran from Jan 29-31.

The IAEA delegation, to be headed by Deputy Director General Herman Nackaerts, is expected to seek explanations regarding intelligence information indicating Iran has engaged in research and development relevant for nuclear weapons.

It coincides with increased tension in the international row over Iranian nuclear work the United States and its allies suspect has military aims. Iran, a major oil producer, says it is aimed at generating electricity.

Western diplomats, who have often accused Iran of stalling tactics as it presses ahead with its nuclear program, have expressed doubt that the planned IAEA trip will lead to any major progress in the long-running nuclear dispute.

Asked whether Iranian officials would be ready to talk about

IAEA questions of possible military links to the nuclear program, Iran's IAEA envoy Ali Asghar Soltanieh told Reuters:

"We are open to discuss any issues that the IAEA is interested to discuss, within the framework of its mandate of course ... I am optimistic that we will have a constructive, professional, technical meeting."

He did not say which Iranian officials would take part in the talks. There was no immediate comment from the IAEA.

Iran rejects accusations that it has coordinated efforts to process uranium, test high explosives and revamp a ballistic missile cone to accommodate a nuclear warhead.

SUBSTANTIVE TALKS?

While U.N. inspectors regularly monitor Iran's declared nuclear facilities, their movements are otherwise restricted, and the IAEA has complained for years of a lack of access to sites, equipment, documents and people relevant to its probe.

Iran says its nuclear work is purely peaceful, and has shown no sign of backing down in the face of international demands that it suspends its uranium enrichment program.

It has stoked Western suspicions by starting to enrich uranium deep inside a mountain at Fordow, stepping up protection of activity that can have both military and civilian purposes.

But its leadership has come under growing pressure since the IAEA reported in November that Tehran appeared to have worked on designing a nuclear weapon and that secret research to that end may be continuing.

Referring to the nuclear dispute, Soltanieh said the discussions with the IAEA team would be aimed at "removing the ambiguities and concluding all this seemingly endless process."

The IAEA visit showed Iran's "determination for cooperation and engagement with the IAEA in a constructive and transparent manner," the Iranian ambassador added.

Iranian officials have used similar language before, and Western diplomats say they remain skeptical about Iran's willingness to seriously answer the agency's questions.

The IAEA wants it "to be a substantive meeting where Iran is actually responding to the questions and not talking about how to respond to the questions in the future," one diplomat said.

"And I think Iran has no intention of responding substantively to the questions," the envoy added.

(Additional reporting by Zahra Hosseinian)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
LiquidDubstep wrote:
Iran has the right to nuclear energy – until we have proof that they are making nuclear weapons, what we are doing is illegal. What happened to innocent until proven guilty?

Jan 17, 2012 1:13pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Bob9999 wrote:
Here is the bottom line: If Iran did not intend to build nuclear weapons, they would have been able to obtain substantial economic benefits by participating in programs intended to ensure that they did not develop nuclear weapons. The fact that Iran is not willing to cooperate, and is instead willing to undergo painful economic sanctions, supports the conclusion that Iran is committed to developing nuclear weapons. Iran’s recent threat against Gulf states who sell oil to buyers participating in a boycott against Iran may be a threat to use nuclear weapons currently under development. That is because, again, if Iran really had no interest in developing nuclear weapons, it would make an economic profit by cooperate with anti-proliferation efforts. At the same time, Iran’s willingness to endure the penalty of economic sanctions instead of receiving the rewards of anti-proliferation programs strongly suggests continuing efforts to develop nuclear weapons. Viewing Iran’s choice of enduring anti-proliferation sanctions instead of giving up its development programs, and placing that choice in the context of Iran’s threats to its neighbors if they support anti-proliferation sanctions, it appears that Iran is threatening to use nuclear weapons against non-cooperative neighbors once the nuclear weapons are developed. The greatest cause for concern is that, even though Iran does not appear to be bluffing, and even though Iran does not appear to be holding the strongest hand, Iran’s approach can succeed only if its opponents throw in their hands. Certainly, this is a mess.

Jan 17, 2012 3:48pm EST  --  Report as abuse
J.Prokhorov wrote:
Here is the self-prophesied and self-arranged failure in the western official approach to Iran,

“And I think Iran has no intention of responding substantively to the questions,” the envoy added.

IE we seem to have sent the wrong envoy. Successful approach includes informed optimism without naivety and good fall-back options just in case, preferably unnecessary. Since initial contact in 2010, I experience Iranian communication as intelligent, positive, constructive, insightful, creative, peaceful and firmly communicated without need, without worry, without panic, without threats and without abuse. This is my experience in person and online.

Send in any blind faith skeptical, rude, appeal to ignorance with arrogance and sure, anything could happen in response, that may be predictable anywhere. Whom the west sends in these official meetings influences results therefore I suggest sending the best, calmest, most logical, most mature we have.

Jan 22, 2012 3:00pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.