Editor's Choice

House to take up anti-piracy bill in February

Committee Chairman Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) (R) and ranking member Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) (L) preside over the second day of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan's confirmation hearings in front of the Senate Judiciary Commitee on Capitol Hill in Washington, June 29, 2010. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Committee Chairman Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) (R) and ranking member Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) (L) preside over the second day of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan's confirmation hearings in front of the Senate Judiciary Commitee on Capitol Hill in Washington, June 29, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

WASHINGTON | Tue Jan 17, 2012 5:40pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The House of Representatives will resume work next month on a controversial bill aimed at stopping online piracy of movies, music and other content, a leading lawmaker said on Tuesday.

The anti-piracy legislation has been a top priority for entertainment companies, publishers, pharmaceutical firms and others, who say it is critical to curbing online piracy.

Internet companies vigorously oppose the bills, arguing they would undermine innovation and free speech rights and compromise the functioning of the Internet.

The debate escalated over the weekend when White House officials raised concerns that the legislation could make businesses on the Internet vulnerable to litigation and harm legal activity and free speech.

Representative Lamar Smith, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said the proposed Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) was needed to protect American businesses from intellectual property theft, and that legislation would move forward.

"Due to the Republican and Democratic retreats taking place over the next two weeks, markup of the Stop Online Piracy Act is expected to resume in February," added Smith, a Texas Republican. "I am committed to continuing to work with my colleagues in the House and Senate to send a bipartisan bill to the White House."

The Senate is expected to begin voting on January 24 on how to proceed in considering its own version of the bill.

Both Smith and Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy have said that they plan to jettison a controversial portion of their bills which would block access for Internet users who seek stolen movies or music.

White House officials, including cyber-security czar Howard Schmidt, said in a blog posting on Saturday that they opposed the bills as currently written. But they said the Obama administration would work with lawmakers on a narrower, more targeted approach to online piracy to ensure that legitimate businesses - including start-up firms - would not be harmed.

Wikipedia, the popular community-edited online encyclopedia, will black out its English-language site for 24 hours Wednesday to oppose the legislation. Other smaller sites leading the campaign include Reddit.com.

(Reporting By Diane Bartz; Editing by Sandra Maler)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
newsreader60 wrote:
So, the crowd-sourced knowledge database Wikipedia is suddenly acting as any other corporation: it dictates to democratically elected governments.

This is simply obscene!

Wikipedia exists because of millions of working hours by millions of people. The compiled information is supposed to belong to everyone. Oh, but Big Brother steps in: “All this is mine! And I will use this tremendous power to do whatever I want!”

This is simply obscene!

It is time to wake up and smell the coffee. All these big companies, such as Wikipedia, Google, Twitter, Facebook, are a real danger to democracy. We cannot, must not sleepwalk into this trap they are setting for us!

Jan 17, 2012 6:26pm EST  --  Report as abuse
newsreader60 wrote:
So, the crowd-sourced knowledge database Wikipedia is suddenly acting as any other corporation: it dictates to democratically elected governments.

This is simply obscene!

Wikipedia exists because of millions of working hours by millions of people. The compiled information is supposed to belong to everyone. Oh, but Big Brother steps in: “All this is mine! And I will use this tremendous power to do whatever I want!”

This is simply obscene!

It is time to wake up and smell the coffee. All these big companies, such as Wikipedia, Google, Twitter, Facebook, are a real danger to democracy. We cannot, must not sleepwalk into this trap they are setting for us!

Jan 17, 2012 6:26pm EST  --  Report as abuse
newsreader60 wrote:
So, the “crowd-sourced knowledge database Wikipedia” is suddenly acting as any other corporation: it dictates to democratically elected governments.

This is simply obscene!

Wikipedia exists because of millions of working hours by millions of people. The compiled information is supposed to belong to everyone. Oh, but Big Brother steps in: “All this is mine! And I will use this tremendous power to do whatever I want!”

This is simply obscene!

It is time to wake up and smell the coffee. All these big companies, such as Wikipedia, Google, Twitter, Facebook, are a real danger to democracy. We cannot, must not sleepwalk into this trap they are setting for us!

Jan 17, 2012 6:27pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.