India says not seeking Iran oil waiver from U.S.

Related Topics

NEW DELHI | Wed Jan 18, 2012 4:46am EST

NEW DELHI (Reuters) - India is not seeking a waiver from the United States that would protect buyers of Iranian oil from a fresh round of sanctions, and New Delhi continues to import from Tehran, Indian Foreign Secretary Ranjan Mathai said on Tuesday.

New U.S. sanctions, authorized on December 31, penalize any financial institution dealing with Iran's central bank and could make it more difficult for India to pay Iran for oil imports. An Indian delegation is currently in Tehran for talks.

The U.S. still allows waivers for firms in countries that significantly reduce dealings with Iran or when it is either in the U.S. national interest or necessary for energy market stability.

Japan, South Korea and Turkey have all said they could seek waivers.

But Mathai said New Delhi was not seeking an exemption and implied it did not see the new sanctions as binding.

"We have accepted sanctions which are made by the United Nations. Other sanctions do not apply to individual countries," Ranjan Mathai told reporters.

"We continue to buy oil from Iran."

Asia's third-largest economy is striving to balance the need to keep importing about $12 billion of Iranian crude annually with a preference to avoid upsetting warming ties with Washington.

The United States and its allies in Europe and elsewhere are putting pressure on Iran to curb a nuclear program they say is aimed at developing an atom bomb. Iran says its goal is to produce nuclear power.

Previous sanctions already made it harder for India to import the 350,000-400,000 barrels per day (bpd) it buys from Iran, about 12 percent of its oil needs. In 2010, the central bank scrapped a long-standing clearance mechanism, triggering a scramble by importers to find a new way to pay.

Since last year, Turkey's Halkbank has routed India's payments to Iran, but that conduit is seen by the government as unstable in the face of the latest U.S. sanctions.

Halkbank has already refused to open an account for state-run Bharat Petroleum Corp for oil from Iran.

An Indian official delegation is now in Tehran trying to find a way to continue the oil trade.

"A ... delegation is on its way to work out the mechanism for continued purchase of oil from Iran and to work out the financing mechanism," Mathai said.

Mohsen Qamsari, head of international affairs at the National Iranian Oil Co., told the Oil Ministry's website SHANA on Tuesday there was no problem in doing business with India.

"Iran's credit from India has been completely reimbursed, and the money flow issue from this country is proceeding normally with no problem," Qamsari said.

Qamsari also said Iran did not have any unsold oil as there was a good appetite for the Islamic state's oil.

"Right now, there is no oil on the water ... There are many requests for buying Iran's crude, and we don't have extra oil to sell," he said.

(Reporting by Nidhi Verma in New Delhi; Additional Reporting by Ramin Mostafavi in Tehran; Editing by Jane Baird)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
Good! one country that has brains and balls to face up to this nonsense that US is blackmailing sorry coercing other countries to play by their rules.
However much I hate this dreaded regime in Iran, we must call a spade a spade.

Jan 17, 2012 10:36pm EST  --  Report as abuse
kordo wrote:
All the blockading countries in history have eventually failed.
Because blockade is a sign of weakness.

Jan 17, 2012 11:56pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Sinbad1 wrote:
The US has never been able to intimidate India, they will do what’s best for India not the US.

Jan 18, 2012 12:31am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.