Crews face test on Italian ship as weather worsens

GIGLIO, Italy Fri Jan 20, 2012 2:31pm EST

1 of 22. People take a picture on a rock in front of the Costa Concordia cruise ship which ran aground off the west coast of Italy at Giglio island January 20, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Giampiero Sposito

Related Topics

GIGLIO, Italy (Reuters) - The vast wreck of the cruise ship Costa Concordia shifted on its undersea ledge on Friday, forcing a new suspension of rescue work and threatening plans to pump oil out to prevent environmental disaster.

Firefighters' spokesman Luca Cari said rescue squads hoped to resume operations and carry on their search throughout the night after the liner appeared to stabilize.

A week after the 114,500-tonne ship ran aground and capsized off the Tuscan coast, hopes of finding anyone alive have all but disappeared and the cold waters around the vessel have become rougher, with worse weather expected at the weekend.

"We decided to allow the search to restart because all the movement was slowing very quickly," said Nicola Castagli, a University of Florence geophysics professor who is supervising the delicate instruments that measure movements on the wreck.

The movement was only of a few millimeters an hour, but had complicated the work of divers already hampered by poor visibility, floating objects and underwater debris.

The government declared a state of emergency for the area, a technical move that would release special funds.

Attention is now turning to how to remove some 2,400 tones of fuel from the vessel, which lies on its side on a rocky shelf in about 20 meters of water off the little island of Giglio and which could slide off its resting place.

Salvage crews are waiting until the search for survivors and bodies is called off before they can begin pumping the fuel out of the wreck, a process expected to take at least two weeks.

Environment experts warn that if the ship tanks rupture and the fuel leaks, Italy could face its worst environmental disaster in more than 20 years.

"If the Costa Concordia slides further down and the fuel begins seeping into the water, we could be talking years and dozens of millions of euros before it can be cleared up," Luigi Alcaro, head of maritime emergencies at the government's environment agency ISPRA, told Reuters.

Environment Minister Corrado Clini told parliament on Thursday he had instructed the liner's operator, Costa Cruises, to take all possible measures to anchor the ship.

He said there was a risk that the ship could sink to 50 to 90 meters below the rock ledge on which it is caught, creating a major hazard to the environment in one of Europe's largest natural marine parks.

Eleven people are known to have died out of more than 4,200 passengers and crew aboard when the ship struck a rock just meters from the shoreline, tearing a large gash in the side of the hull. Twenty-one are still unaccounted for.

Rescue workers are still looking for a missing five-year-old girl and her father.


The ship's captain, Francesco Schettino, has been placed under house arrest, accused of causing the disaster and then abandoning ship before the evacuation was complete.

His lawyer says he has admitted bringing the ship too close to shore but denies sole responsibility and says other factors may have played a role in the accident.

The ship's operators have suspended him and said they considered themselves an injured party in the accident, which industry experts say could turn out to be the biggest maritime insurance claim in history.

But in his hometown of Meta di Sorrento, near Naples, the captain won some sympathy.

"I know him by sight and by reputation. He's always been serious and capable," said 27-year-old Giovanni Barbato, an orthodontist, who said many in the town had been deeply offended at the way Schettino had been portrayed in the press.

On Thursday, SkyTG24 broadcast a tape of what was described as a conversation between coastguard officials and the bridge of the Concordia which appeared to show officers telling authorities they had suffered only a power cut, more than 30 minutes after the ship's impact with the seabed.

In an interview with the daily Corriere della Sera, the chief executive of Costa Cruises criticized Schettino for delaying the order to evacuate and denied he had been pressured to wait because of the potential cost to the company.

"I assure you absolutely that no one thought in financial terms. That would be a choice that would violate our ethics," he said. He denied knowledge of captains sailing dangerously close to shore to provide a spectacle for passengers.

The Italian government is considering new regulations to prevent big cruise ships from taking risky routes and passing too close to islands or shorelines.

(Additional reporting by Laura Viggiano in Meta di Sorrento and Silvia Ognibene in Grosseto; Editing by Philip Pullella and Andrew Roche)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (1)
SeniorMoment wrote:
The captain who abandoned his ship and refused to go back to it, not only will never be able to get another captaincy, but he likely will die in poverty. No one will want to hire him for any employment above the Italian minimum wage and there would be zero demand for book rights to his story. He is now universally regarded as at the minimum a coward and at the maximum a murderer.

The Italian government should not depend on the shipping company to take necessary actions. The lawsuits in the case of the New Carissa, which sank off Oregon in 1999 causing enviromental damage in a highly environmentally sensitive area, show that governments need to act immediately on their own.

What is needed is a global authority to hold bonds for each shipping company so that money is always available to pay for whatever damage containments are needed. What starts with any shipwreck is the legal disputes over who is reponsible and who needs to pay for what has to be done to limit further damages.

To prevent serious adverse consequences though national governments need to immediately after shipwrecks fund the cleanup and containment operations. Asking a cruise company right after a major financial loss from a shipwreck that will continue to impair revenue to voluntarily pay for anything is unrealistic. Owners have even refused to carry out national government ordered actions and are just as likely to turn around and blame the government if for example, attempts to sink a severely damaged ship in deep water are unsuccessful.

Governments need to make sure they collect the fees and bonds necessary to pay for future wrecks in advance in otherwise untouchable reserve funds for when a shipwreck happens.

Jan 20, 2012 1:32am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.