Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Libyan Islamists rally to demand sharia-based law

Related Topics

1 of 4. A Libyan Muslim campaigning for sharia law demonstrates in Tripoli's Algeria Square January 20, 2012. The sign reads: ''Islam is a perfect religion, there is no need for any other law''.

Credit: Reuters/Ismail Zitouny

TRIPOLI | Fri Jan 20, 2012 6:11pm EST

TRIPOLI (Reuters) - Hundreds of Libyan Islamists rallied on Friday to demand that Muslim sharia law inspire legislation in what organizers called a response to the emergence of secular political parties after the fall of Muammar Gaddafi's dictatorship last year.

Assembled by Islamist political and religious groups, mostly young and bearded men holding up copies of the Koran demonstrated in squares in the capital Tripoli, the eastern city of Benghazi and in Sabha in the southern desert.

In Tripoli's Algeria Square, Islamists burned copies of the "Green Book," Gaddafi's eccentric handbook on politics, economics and everyday life, to underline that the Koran should be the country's main source of legislation.

By contrast, a group of secularists who have staged a sit-in in the square for more than a month chanted: "We want a civil state."

The Islamist demonstrators encompassed members of the conservative Muslim Brotherhood and harder-line Salafis, who both back strict versions of Islam, and relative moderates who prefer a civil state simply inspired by sharia.

The protests offered a glimpse into Libya's political future in which Islamist and secularist parties are expected to vie for seats in a national assembly scheduled to be elected in June to draft a constitution for the North African country.

Experts believe the Muslim Brotherhood is the most organized political force and could emerge as the leading political player in Libya after Gaddafi, who harshly suppressed Islamists during his 42 years in autocratic power.

Western powers are coming to accept that the advent of democracy in the Arab world means bringing Islamists to power. They have become the biggest election winners in Egypt, Tunisia and Morocco over the past few months.

The chairman of Libya's ruling National Transitional Council (NTC), Mustafa Abdul Jalil, promised in October to uphold Islamic law. "We as a Muslim nation have taken Islamic sharia as the source of legislation, therefore any law that contradicts the principles of Islam is legally nullified," he said.

The deputy central bank governor said last month a law regulating Islamic banking would be issued in the first quarter of 2012, but stressed that both conventional and Islamic banks would be allowed to operate in Libya.

Islamists in Algeria Square held up placards demanding a financial system respecting Islam's ban on interest and calling for a constitution derived from sharia's legal and moral codes.

"We want to run our life according to Islamic principles, be it the economy, politics or our relations with other countries," said Abdul Basit Ghuwaila, a preacher at a Tripoli mosque. "Most people think Islam is just about harsh penalties."

Ghuwaila, 49, said sharia should not govern all Libyan law, but insisted that legislation should not contradict it.

Nour al-Zintani, a participant in the month-long sit-in for a secular state, said the majority of Libyans wanted Islam to be a part of their life but not a strict interpretation of it.

"We all want sharia," she said, standing next to her teenage daughter, both of them wearing a Muslim headscarf, "but not the one they're talking about, the one that rejects women. We want a moderate Islam that gives women their rights."

(Additional reporting by Mohammad Al Tommy; Editing by Mark Heinrich)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Qeds wrote:
BBC News wrote and article today about the state of chaos Libya is in after the UN orchestrated regime change.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-16655046

Is this the kind of freedom the UN resolutions are bringing?

Before Gaddafi was killed Reuters had daily articles about Libya, nowadays nothing about the deplorable state the country is in. Killings, looting, injustice, revenge. Oh wait, i think i get it… probably now the Qatar mercenaries were being shipped to Syria. They have a new “popular uprising” to stage and Reuters a new propaganda blank file to fill. Shameful standards.

Jan 20, 2012 9:32pm EST  --  Report as abuse
tukarabber wrote:
It’s all just coverups by Obama and his henchman the Bitwit and French f..cks to steal oil from Libya cos they didn’t like the deals they had made with Quaddafi if you check the facts. This was why they freed the Libyan bomber as part of the deal. Typical fake ”humanitarian/ free speech frauds got him released to a heroes welcome while Obama played ”outraged and dumb”. So where are Quaddafis and his sons human rights? As Billary said ”we came, we saw and we killed…with a wolfish laugh. All the collateral damge in Afgan and Iraq, yet not one killed in Libya where we had boots on the ground. This is Obama and Liberals war that’s not ”war” as the liars and frauds they are. Yes Obama did knowingly back Al Queda to win. Now the Taliban and Al Queda are Liberals very best friends according to Obama liberals as the biggest menace on earth. They all need to be Impeached for the scum they are.

Jan 21, 2012 2:30am EST  --  Report as abuse
thehindmost wrote:
Tukarabber….I really suggest you check the facts yourself, and a dictionary. We did not land a SINGLE troop on the ground in Libya. We did nothing but provide air support and maintain air superiority. And another fun fact, Libya doesn’t export oil to the US, its exports all its oil to Europe, who was and still is going through financial turmoil…that lend a new view of why we helped the rebels beat back Gaddafi as fast as possible instead of letting a civil war drag out as long as it took? And does that also explain possibly why until the article Qeds just linked, or ones that came right after Gaddafi’s death, that expect for a few lines here or there in other articles there being no mention of in fighting amongst different rebel groups? And also, as crazy, eccentric, and oppressive to his own people as he was…say bye bye to his particular and in my mind quite genius version of an African Union. (To quote George W. Bush): It’ll take time to restore chaos.

Jan 21, 2012 7:03am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.