After threats, Iran plays down U.S. naval moves

TEHRAN Sat Jan 21, 2012 10:58am EST

Related Topics

TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps said on Saturday it considered the likely return of U.S. warships to the Gulf part of routine activity, backing away from previous warnings to Washington not to re-enter the area.

The statement may be seen as an effort to reduce tensions after Washington said it would respond if Iran made good on a threat to block the Strait of Hormuz - the vital shipping lane for oil exports from the Gulf.

"U.S. warships and military forces have been in the Persian Gulf and the Middle East region for many years and their decision in relation to the dispatch of a new warship is not a new issue and it should be interpreted as part of their permanent presence," Revolutionary Guard Deputy Commander Hossein Salami told the official IRNA news agency.

The apparently conciliatory comments may be a response to the European Union and Washington's rejection of Iran's declaration it was close to resuming negotiations with world powers and with the Pentagon saying it did not expect any challenge to its warships.

Crude prices have spiked several times this year on fears diplomatic tensions could escalate to military clashes as well as uncertainty about the effect of sanctions on the oil market.

Along with the EU, which is set to agree an embargo on Iranian oil next week, Washington hopes the sanctions will force Iran to suspend the nuclear activities it believes are aimed at making an atom bomb, a charge Tehran denies.

There has been no U.S. aircraft carrier in the Gulf since the USS John C. Stennis left at the end of December at a time when the Revolutionary Guard was conducting naval maneuvers.

On January 3, after U.S. President Barack Obama signed new sanctions aimed at stopping Iran's oil exports, Tehran told the Stennis not to return - an order interpreted by some observers in Iran and Washington as a blanket threat to any U.S. carriers.

"I recommend and emphasize to the American carrier not to return to the Persian Gulf," Iran's army chief, Major General Ataollah Salehi, said at the time. "We are not in the habit of warning more than once."


Washington says it will return to the Gulf and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said any move to block Hormuz - through which around a third of the world's sea-borne traded oil passes - would be seen as a "red line," requiring a response.

Citing operational security, the Pentagon will not say when the next carrier will return to the Gulf but officials say it is only a matter of time and they do not expect any problems.

In the coming days or weeks, the Revolutionary Guard will begin new naval exercises in the Strait of Hormuz and the Gulf. Salami told IRNA these would go ahead as planned in the Iranian month of Bahman which runs from January 21 to February 19.

Iran has said it is ready to return to talks with world powers that stalled one year ago, but the West, concerned about Tehran's move of the most sensitive atomic work to a bomb-proof bunker, says it must first see a willingness from Tehran to address the nuclear issue.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy said on Friday "time is running out" for a diplomatic solution and urged Russia and China to drop their opposition to sanctions on Iranian oil.

Iran is OPEC's second biggest exporter and blocking its crude exports - through the EU embargo or U.S. moves to punish banks that trade with Iran - could have a devastating impact on its economy but there are no signs so far such pressure would force it to stop what it calls its peaceful nuclear rights.

(Writing by Robin Pomeroy; Editing by Sophie Hares)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (10)
all41and14all wrote:
This is a high stakes game for the persian empire. If it wasn’t for the radical islamist ruling the country, this probably wouldn’t be such an issue. I know several Iranian/Americans, thier attitude toward this islamic regime ruling thier homeland is less then respectful. The persians had resisted Islamic fundamentalism for centuries however now thier necks are in a noose because of them.
With Iraqi and Libyan oil coming soon the Iranians hand will change.The Iranian Islamists regime will increase thier antics in both these countries to slow progress but w/less $, that may prove difficult. Ideally the Iranian people should take this opportuntiy to change thier leadership to a more democratic base.This country has alot of potential if they can normalize thier status away from radicalism. Irans real history is dynamic although the current regime is stalling its greatness for the sake of power in the name of Islam. What a shame. This countries people could be a real contributor to the world, if only it was free.Oil may be the lubricant to set it free.

Jan 21, 2012 9:45am EST  --  Report as abuse
BCerentano wrote:
Guess who blinked… anyone surprised?

Jan 21, 2012 10:42am EST  --  Report as abuse
Intriped wrote:
Flinched AGAIN! Where is that tough talk Amestinkajad?

Jan 21, 2012 11:48am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.