For Obama 2012, it's all about the 99 percent

WASHINGTON Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:04pm EST

1 of 2. U.S. President Barack Obama pauses during his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress on Capitol Hill in Washington, January 24, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Saul Loeb/Pool

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama threw red meat to his political base on Tuesday with a promise to do the nearly impossible: solve the problem of widening U.S. income inequality.

Faced with the very real possibility of losing the White House in November, Obama used his State of the Union address to demand a tax increase for millionaires and launch an aggressive campaign arc built upon economic fairness.

"No debate is more important," Obama said early in his hour-long speech before a joint session of Congress.

"We can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well while a growing number of Americans barely get by, or we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, and everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules."

In recent months, Obama had made clear he would mine the vein of resentment in America over the growing income gap, the source of inspiration for last year's Occupy Wall Street movement that highlighted the concentration of wealth among 1 percent of the population.

But by choosing to make it the cornerstone of his annual speech to the nation, he cemented the theme of working for the 99 percent as his campaign battlecry for the next 10 months.

He could not have chosen a better day to contrast his populist ideas with his possible Republican challenger.

Mitt Romney, one of the wealthiest presidential candidates in history, released tax returns on Tuesday that showed he and his wife paid an effective tax rate of 13.9 percent in 2010 and expect to pay a 15.4 percent effective tax rate for 2011.

Obama proposed a minimum tax rate of 30 percent for people who make $1 million or more a year, a clear shot at his would-be rival, even though he was unnamed in the speech.

"I think it's one of the best cards he can play, especially given that Mitt Romney released his tax returns today," said

Henry Brady, dean of the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley.

"People are worried about fairness in the tax code. So it seems to me that this is something where he has the rhetorical advantage."

Senior administration officials said the 30 percent figure was established long before Romney's tax rate was made public.

One noted, however, that not all wealthy people kept their money in accounts on the Cayman Islands, a dig at the former Massachusetts governor, whose advisers said his holdings included amounts in funds based in the Cayman Islands and other overseas entities.

POPULIST STRATEGY

Obama's tax reform proposal, made on one of the biggest campaign stages of the year, is the latest in a series of moves the president has made to appeal to the middle class and to present a populist message.

The president's fall deficit reduction proposals and recent appointment of a director to lead the consumer financial protection agency that is unpopular with Republicans have raised the temperature and highlighted the contrasts between him and the opposition party.

Nevertheless, the president knows he has almost no chance of getting his millionaire tax proposal through a divided Congress.

But the issue gives him a strong talking point to energize his political base, much of which has been disenchanted with his record.

"It's a great issue for President Obama. It's something that his base has been waiting for," said Democratic strategist Bud Jackson. "He has started to move to a more combative approach in terms of contrasting himself with Republicans ... and I also think that dovetails nicely with Mitt Romney or Newt Gingrich or whoever the nominee will be."

The president will take the message on a five-state, three-day trip beginning on Wednesday.

The state choices are not coincidental. He is going to Iowa, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, and Michigan - all battlegrounds that could help decide the general election.

Officials said he would release more details about his business, energy, and college affordability proposals during the trip.

Supporters are eager to have more details - and more red meat.

"I did particularly like that he described income inequality and the support of the middle class as the defining issues of our time," said James Catalano, 51, of Tampa, Florida, who attended a party with other Democrats to watch the speech.

"I thought it was really moderate and reasonable, which was a little frustrating."

(Additional reporting by Patricia Zengerle; editing by Mary Milliken and Eric Beech)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (41)
Talleyrand02 wrote:
He should have thought about this in 2009 when he had the Middle Class killers in a corner. I, like many, am aware that the GOP can’t do economy, because they lack scruples and compassion and begin perspiring profusely in the presence of people who earn less than a few million a year investing in China, but many other’s prefer to forget, having been trained to forget anything that happened three days ago. That is the disastrous effect of TV, by the way.

Jan 25, 2012 2:13am EST  --  Report as abuse
txgadfly wrote:
And Obama needs to stop the Afghan War now! It is a war fought by the 99% for the interests, mainly, of the 1%, or certainly the top 10%. And absolutely no more wars or disproportionate military spending in the MENA. Cut off Israel and send Israelis with American passports back home, and with out our citizenship too.

Isn’t it funny that he runs against a Party that stands only for the rich and that cannot demonstrate any success at generating middle class jobs? How can he possibly lose?

Jan 25, 2012 3:18am EST  --  Report as abuse
Sal20111 wrote:
Hollow words. He dished out over $14 trillion to the 1%, the greedy, grubby “banksters”, the likes of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. There’s not much difference skin deep, between Obama, Gingrich and Romney. They will say anything, try anything to fool the ordinary citizen to perpetuate their own power ride. The only US politician on the radar with well thought economic ideas and the sincerity to implement these for the benefit of the 100% is Ron Paul – the 99% sorely needs him as the next President, not Obama (O)bummer.

Jan 25, 2012 6:15am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.