Government opens case against accused swindler Stanford

HOUSTON Tue Jan 24, 2012 8:05pm EST

Allen Stanford arrives at the Federal Court in Houston January 23, 2012.   REUTERS/Richard Carson

Allen Stanford arrives at the Federal Court in Houston January 23, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Richard Carson

Related Topics

HOUSTON (Reuters) - Texas financier Allen Stanford used lies and bribes to steal the hard-earned savings of his customers, prosecutors said on Tuesday.

The former billionaire is accused of selling certificates of deposit from his bank in Antigua and using the money to finance his lifestyle, in one of the biggest white collar cases since Bernard Madoff.

"He told them lie, after lie, after lie," prosecutor Gregg Costa told the jury at the start of Stanford's trial on criminal fraud charges in federal court in Houston.

Stanford, 61, dressed in a grey suit and white shirt, pleaded not guilty to a 14-count indictment. "I plead not guilty to every count," the former billionaire said in an emphatic voice.

He rocked in his chair, listening intently as Costa laid out the government's case of a sprawling $7 billion Ponzi scheme originating with Stanford International Bank in Antigua. Stanford used it as "his own private piggy bank," Costa said.

"Really, that is the perfect name for the bank, because the bank was there to enrich Mr. Stanford."

Stanford spent millions of dollars of investor funds on his hobby of cricket, his private airplanes and a company that was formed to take care of his yacht, the Sea Eagle, Costa said.

He bribed his accountant and a regulator in Antigua in an effort to keep U.S. authorities at bay, Costa said.

Robert Scardino, one of Stanford's lawyers, told the jury that the Texas native was an astute businessman whose business was ruined when the government seized it in 2009.

"Stanford was kind of an absentee CEO, a visionary," Scardino told jurors.

He argued that every dime investors put into CDs issued from the Antigua bank was repaid over the course of 22 years.

"He paid every penny that was promised," Scardino said. "Never once failed, no evidence of a fraud."

Stanford's businesses and investments were all legitimate until the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed civil charges in February 2009 and seized all of Stanford's assets, Scardino said.

Witnesses for the prosecution include former employees, financial advisers who allegedly peddled certificates of deposit for the bank and Stanford's former chief financial officer, James Davis, who is the only co-defendant who has pleaded guilty to the scheme.

Stanford will take the stand to answer any questions the prosecution has and talk about his charitable works on Antigua, Scardino said.

The defense may also call accountants and other financial experts who can attest to the accuracy of the bank's documents, Scardino said.

(Reporting by Anna Driver; Editing by Eddie Evans, Bernard Orr)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
Intriped wrote:
I thought he was in Davos.

Jan 24, 2012 10:28pm EST  --  Report as abuse
borisjimbo wrote:
He wishes he were in Davos.

Jan 24, 2012 11:08pm EST  --  Report as abuse
WeWereWallSt wrote:
His shareholders are in Davos.

We love it. “Stanford will take the stand to answer any questions the prosecution has and talk about his charitable works on Antigua, Scardino said.”

A week ago he was unfit to stand trial, having lost his memory and ability to think, blah blah yadda yadda.

We say let him go, because the good Lord is clearly shining upon him, what with that miracle and all. Anybody note any signs of leprosy? No? See!

It’ll be interesting to hear how his lawyers introduce him when he takes the stand. We’re sure it’s a bum rap. We’re just wondering how they’ll articulate that.

Jan 25, 2012 6:29am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.