Republican senator wants Keystone XL bill

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Fri Jan 27, 2012 8:24pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republican Senator John Hoeven is set to introduce legislation on Monday seeking to bypass President Barack Obama and empower Congress to approve the controversial Keystone XL pipeline, an aide said on Friday.

Obama put TransCanada's $7 billion Canada-to-Texas pipeline on ice last week, saying that the administration needed more time to review its environmental impacts.

Hoeven's bill would seek to put Congress effectively in control of the pipeline decision and take it away from the Obama administration.

But any such measure faces the steep hurdle of having to be approved by the Democratic-controlled Senate. And even if it did, it would have to be signed by the president in order to become law.

Environmentalists pushed for Obama to block the 1,700-mile (2,735-km) pipeline. They loathe the idea of increasing the flow of oil sands crude from Canada because of its bigger carbon footprint in the mining process.

Republicans say the pipeline would create jobs but environmentalists say the job-creation claims are inflated.

"We've been working with (the Republican) leadership in the Senate and all our colleagues, and we believe Senator Hoeven's bill has support from a lot of people in the Senate," said Ryan Bernstein, an energy advisor to Hoeven.

Bernstein declined to elaborate on how many other senators have signed on to sponsor the bill.

Republicans have made the pipeline and its construction jobs a key political issue in the run-up to the 2012 presidential election.

Lawmakers in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives also are considering legislation to advance the project, and have not ruled out attaching it to payroll tax cut legislation that needs to pass Congress by the end of February.

On the Senate side, the route for Keystone to advance to a vote is not yet clear.

"We'll introduce it and I'm sure we'll be looking at all options," Bernstein told Reuters.

(Reporting by Roberta Rampton; Editing by Sandra Maler and Christopher Wilson)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
hogsmile wrote:
“Neither life, liberty nor property are safe while the Legislature is in session …”.

Another harebrained idea from (needless to say) another Republican legislator; par for the course from that side of the aisle. Washington D.C., one of the most dysfunctional cities in the United States, is administered by two committees of Congress. That fact alone should serve as a warning.

Jan 27, 2012 8:38pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Burns0011 wrote:
Sorry, this pipeline is a bad idea and trying to rush it through because the oil companies are paying Republican Congressmen and Senators off is just more of the same.

Every one of those that want to vote for this to approve it without proper regulation should be investigated for corruption and accepting bribes.

Jan 27, 2012 11:35pm EST  --  Report as abuse
xyz2055 wrote:
The U.S. is currently exporting approximately 500,000 barrels of gasoline a day. So we need this extra dirty oil because…..?

Jan 28, 2012 12:00am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.