The dome of the Capitol is reflected in a puddle in Washington February 17, 2012.REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Another debt ceiling debacle could sink the economy

Last year's Congressional debt standoff hurt consumer confidence more than the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Betsey Johnson and Justin Wolfers write. This time could be worse.  Read more at Counterparties  

U.S. group sues to halt artist Christo's project

Artist Christo receives his ''Goldene Henne'' (Golden Hen) media award in the category ''Life Achievement'' during the prize ceremony at the Friedrichstadtpalast in Berlin, September 15, 2010. REUTERS/Michael Kappeler

Artist Christo receives his ''Goldene Henne'' (Golden Hen) media award in the category ''Life Achievement'' during the prize ceremony at the Friedrichstadtpalast in Berlin, September 15, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Michael Kappeler

DENVER | Thu Feb 2, 2012 9:59am EST

DENVER (Reuters) - A coalition of environmentalists, outdoor enthusiasts and wildlife advocates have filed a federal lawsuit to block a project by the artist Christo that would drape fabric canopies along a long stretch of the Arkansas River in Colorado.

Opponents of the Bulgarian-born Christo's proposed "Over the River" project sued the U.S. Bureau of Land Management in Denver, saying the agency violated federal law and its own policies when it gave final approval to the project last fall.

The flamboyant Christo, known for his massive outdoor artworks, including erecting 7,500 fabric gates in New York City's Central Park, plans to hang 5.9 miles of "silvery, translucent" panels intermittently along the river between Canon City and Salida, Colorado, according to his web site.

But opponents seeking to halt the project argued in their lawsuit that allowing the drilling of some 9,000 bores to anchor 925 fabric panels would adversely impact wildlife, cause traffic tie-ups and disrupt recreational activities.

"Installing the anchor bolts and other hardware requires large drilling equipment normally used for mining and heavy construction activities. The art project is, in fact, more similar to mineral resource extraction and development than recreation," the suit said.

Bureau of Land Management spokeswoman Tina Brown said the agency was aware of the lawsuit, filed by Denver University law students on behalf of nonprofit Rags Over the Arkansas River Inc. (ROAR). Brown said the bureau does not comment on pending litigation.

Christo is not a defendant in the lawsuit. But his lawyer, Steve Coffin, said the project went through a comprehensive and thorough review by federal land managers.

"We're confidant that it will withstand legal scrutiny," Coffin said.

ROAR spokeswoman Joan Anzelmo characterized the case as a classic David versus Goliath battle.

"ROAR is aiming its slingshot directly at the Goliath Over the River project and at the Bureau of Land Management that gave the go-ahead despite its federal stewardship responsibilities for public lands, water and wildlife," she said in a statement.

Of particular concern to ROAR is the potential impact to a herd of bighorn sheep, Colorado's state mammal.

"The (project) will increase the bighorn sheep's susceptibility to disease, disperse sheep from their primary habitat along the Arkansas River, and will likely increase the mortality rate in young lambs," the lawsuit said.

The project, which has been in the works for more than a decade, still needs the green light from local jurisdictions before construction gets underway. Christo's plans call for it to be unveiled in August 2014 and stay up for a two-week period.

The river project is not Christo's first foray in Colorado. In 1972, his "Valley Curtain" project consisting of a fabric curtain suspended across the Rifle Gap in western Colorado was shredded by high winds hours after it was unveiled.

(Editing by Dan Whitcomb and Cynthia Johnston)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
frankkarlburn wrote:
They are absolutely right. Climbers no longer drill rock cliffs — neither should artists.

Feb 01, 2012 10:26pm EST  --  Report as abuse
They are right to fight this. I remember Chisto’s 1972 curtain, because it went up the day I moved to Colorado (where I lived for the next two decades.) It was in the news that day, blown apart by the wind. It was a silly thing then, and everything Christo has done since has been equally silly. The people of Colorado can prove themselves true art critics by denying Christo another chance to do something stupid in their beautiful state.

Feb 01, 2012 10:48pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Bookdoc wrote:
I am not a big environmental person, but this borders on the ridiculous. No one will see this “art”-this “artist” is known for hanging material on things. Who the heck is paying for this nonsense. That’s the ones to go after. I don’t believe natural areas are sacred, but trashing a natural area is a foolish waste of time and capital.

Feb 01, 2012 10:56pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.