Illinois accuses mortgage firm of robosigning

Thu Feb 2, 2012 2:24pm EST

Related Topics

(Reuters) - The attorney general in Illinois on Thursday sued a mortgage document firm and said it filed "faulty" documents with local governments in a rush to process mortgages and foreclosures.

Nationwide Title Clearing Inc was a "key contributor" to the mortgage crisis by "undermining the integrity and accuracy of the mortgage servicing and foreclosure process," Attorney General Lisa Madigan said in a statement.

The Palm Harbor, Florida-based firm prepares documents for mortgage servicers to use against borrowers who are in default or foreclosure.

A spokeswoman for Nationwide Title said the firm had not yet seen the lawsuit.

The lawsuit comes as Illinois and other states are close to signing an agreement with five top U.S. banks to resolve allegations of mortgage servicing and foreclosure abuses.

Those negotiations began more than one year ago, after reports emerged that workers had "robo-signed," or signed without reading, thousands of pages of mortgage documents, which in some cases led to unlawful foreclosures.

That multistate settlement does not include contractors used by the banks in some of the questionable practices.

Nationwide Title works for eight of the 10 largest lenders and mortgage servicers, according to the lawsuit.

Its employees often signed documents as "vice president" of other companies, even though they were Nationwide Title workers, the lawsuit said.

Crystal Moore, for example, signed documents as a vice president of Citi Residential Lending Inc, even though she was an employee of National Title.

The employees sign a few thousand documents each day, and do not read and verify the documents they sign, according to the lawsuit.

The documents often include statements that the signatory has personal knowledge of the facts in the document, the lawsuit said.

The company is a "document production factory," Madigan said in the lawsuit.

The lawsuit, filed in Cook County Circuit Court, accuses the firm of violating the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Practices Act and the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Through the lawsuit Madigan asked the court to require the firm to review and fix documents it unlawfully created and recorded, and pay back revenue and profit it gained through the practices.

The suit also seeks civil penalties of up to $50,000 per violation.

Madigan has stepped up her state's efforts to punish companies for what she views as their role in the 2007-2009 financial crisis.

She sued Standard & Poor's last week, for example, and said it fueled the nation's housing and financial crises by assigning inflated credit ratings to risky mortgage-backed securities.

Madigan also appeared with Attorney General Eric Holder and other top U.S. officials in Washington last week to announce a new federal-state working group that would investigate misconduct in the packaging and sale of home loans to investors.

(Reporting By Aruna Viswanatha in Washington, editing by Matthew Lewis)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
SantaFean wrote:
Why did they use fraud and forgery? If you really want to know….
Call your “pretender” lender or “servicer”, AKA debt collector, and ask them to validate your mortgage note. Where is the original mortgage note? Who possesses it? Who is the holder in due course? Who is the beneficial owner? You WILL be lied to, misled and even questioned over your right to know! Also write to your “lender” with a QUALIFIED WRITTEN REQUEST and see if the “lender” EVER validates the debt! You need to read your state’s Uniform Commercial Code regarding Negotiable Instruments and WHO has the right to collect your money. Try it, I dare you.

Feb 02, 2012 3:50pm EST  --  Report as abuse
jroliver wrote:
That’s one now I’d like to see the other 49 attorney generals do the right thing and protect the consumer

Feb 02, 2012 3:55pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.