Unpaid intern sues Harper's Bazaar for minimum wage

NEW YORK Thu Feb 2, 2012 10:05am EST

Related Topics

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A former intern at Harper's Bazaar is suing the magazine's publisher, Hearst Corporation, saying that her internship violates labor laws because it was unpaid, according to a lawsuit filed in federal court in New York.

Xuedan Wang, 28, was an intern at the magazine's accessories department from August to December last year, where she typically worked at least 40 hours a week, and sometimes as much as 55 hours, without pay, according to her lawsuit filed on Wednesday.

"Unpaid interns are becoming the modern-day equivalent of entry-level employees, except that employers are not paying them for the many hours they work," the lawsuit says.

"Employers' failure to compensate interns for their work, and the prevalence of the practice nationwide, curtails opportunities for employment, fosters class divisions between those who can afford to work for no wage and those who cannot, and indirectly contributes to rising unemployment."

The lawsuit contends that Wang, who also uses the first name Diana, and hundreds of other unpaid interns like her are a "crucial labor force" at Hearst.

"If the interns weren't doing the work then they would have to hire someone else to do it," Elizabeth Wagoner, one of Wang's lawyers, said in an interview -- a sign, she said, that labor laws are being broken.

Wang and her lawyers hope to ask other people who have worked as unpaid interns for Hearst to join the class-action lawsuit. Wang is seeking minimum-wage pay and overtime pay in damages.

Wang, who now lives in Brooklyn in New York City, completed a degree in strategic communications at Ohio State University and took the internship because she wants to work in the fashion industry, her lawyer said. Wang was not available for comment, her lawyer said.

Paul Luthringer, a spokesman for Hearst Corporation, said the company had not been served with the lawsuit, and so could not comment.

According to information for prospective interns published on the Hearst careers website, the company does not pay its interns but instead offers them academic credit, a practice that is widespread among publishing companies and in other competitive industries.

"The goals of Hearst Magazines internships are to provide opportunities for students to gain valuable experience and exposure to the world of publishing," the company says on its careers website.

Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a company may legally offer unpaid internships so long as they are educational and benefit the intern and not necessarily the employer, according to information published on the Department of Labor's website.

The department says that unpaid interns must not displace regular employees and that "the employer that provides the training derives no immediate advantage from the activities of the intern; and on occasion its operations may actually be impeded."

(Editing by Greg McCune)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
lakshmanan_p wrote:
In whatever way and name they are doing it, it is totally inhuman and not helpful for the nation to solve the immediate problem of unemployment. There must be a pay,however small may it be!

Feb 01, 2012 7:23pm EST  --  Report as abuse
jroliver wrote:
The Repubs won’t like this at all. Why the hell should this girl expect to get paid. I sure the money saved went into some nice bonuses for the Execs. That’s the American way

Feb 01, 2012 9:01pm EST  --  Report as abuse
It is an option for any company whether or not an internship is paid. This is usually a student trying to gain experience and contacts in their industry. It is customary that the student knows up front if the internship will be paid or not before he accepts it. So, what is the problem here?

Feb 02, 2012 12:23pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.