Attack on Iran "would be disaster," must talk: Turkey

Related Topics

MUNICH | Sun Feb 5, 2012 8:37am EST

MUNICH (Reuters) - Turkey and Qatar urged the West Sunday not to attack Iran to solve a nuclear row, but to make greater efforts to negotiate an end to the dispute.

Speaking at the Munich Security Conference, a gathering of security officials and diplomats, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said an attack would be a "disaster" and the dispute over Iran's nuclear program could be ended very rapidly.

"If there is strong political will and mutual confidence being established, this issue could be resolved in a few days," he said. "The technical disputes are not so big. The problem is mutual confidence and strong political will. "

Turkey was the venue of the last talks between Western powers and Iran a year ago which ended in stalemate because participants could not even agree on an agenda.

The West has since imposed much tougher sanctions on Iran, which it suspects of seeking nuclear weapons capability. Iran says its nuclear work is purely civilian and peaceful.

Davutoglu added: "A military option will create a disaster in our region. So before that disaster, everybody must be serious in negotiations. We hope soon both sides will meet again but this time there will be a complete result."

In Tehran, the deputy head of Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards told the semi-official Fars news agency Iran would attack any country whose territory is used by "enemies" of the Islamic state to launch a military strike against its soil.

Washington and Israel have not ruled out military action if diplomacy fails to resolve the standoff. Iran has warned of firm retaliation if attacked, including targeting Israel and U.S. bases in the Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz shipping lane.

Qatar's Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Khalid Mohamed al-Attiyah, whose Gulf country is increasingly active in regional diplomacy, said an attack "is not a solution, and tightening the embargo on Iran will make the scenario worse. I believe we should have dialogue."

"I believe that with our allies and friend in the West we should open a serious dialogue with the Iranians to get out of this dilemma. This is what we feel in our region."

Tension between Iran and the West rose last month when Washington and the European Union imposed the toughest sanctions yet on Iran to try to force it to provide more information on its nuclear program. The measures are aimed at shutting off the second-biggest OPEC oil exporters' sales of crude.

(Reporting by William Maclean; Editing by Tim Pearce)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
BCerentano wrote:
Surprise!!!!!

OK Iran backers, spin this one.

Feb 05, 2012 10:47am EST  --  Report as abuse
GuyFaulkes wrote:
Spin what? Its common sense.

Feb 05, 2012 1:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Sal20111 wrote:
How much money would it take to buy out Iran’s nuclear programme, rather the bomb making element of it: $1 billion, $10b, $100b, $1trillion? I’m willing to bet it’ll be much less than the cost of the sanctions and or war. Give the money to the military companies who will benefit from the war, so that they don’t complain. Take the money from all UN member countries, with a warranty from Iran. Result: no civilian or military casuatlies, military industry complex shareholders are satisfied, one less nuclear bomb out of the thousands which already exist, Iranian regime big shots opens bank accounts in Switzerland, and it becomes a non-issue in US politics, less of a burden on taxpayers of all concerned Western countries. Anything wrong with this unless you’re just some sort of bloodthirsty global sadist?

Feb 05, 2012 5:12pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.