U.S. drone attack kills 10 in Pakistan: officials

Related Topics

MIRANSHAH, Pakistan | Tue Feb 7, 2012 11:28pm EST

MIRANSHAH, Pakistan (Reuters) - A U.S. drone aircraft killed 10 suspected militants in Pakistan's North Waziristan region near the Afghanistan border on Wednesday, security officials and residents said, the fifth such strike this year.

The unacknowledged Central Intelligence Agency drone program, a key element in U.S. counter-terrorism efforts, was apparently halted after a November NATO air attack from across the Afghan border killed 24 Pakistani soldiers enraged Pakistan.

The United States resumed attacks with the missile-firing drones in northwest Pakistan on January 10.

In Wednesday's attack, a drone fired two missiles at a house suspected of being a militant hideout in the village of Thapi, 15 km (10 miles) east of Miranshah, the main town in North Waziristan.

The building was completely destroyed and 10 suspected militants were killed, Pakistani security officials said.

"Almost all the men were burnt beyond recognition," a villager said after visiting the destroyed house.

"Dozens of militants arrived later and took over rescue work. They pulled out nine bodies," he said, requesting anonymity.

Security officials and villagers said the dead included foreign fighters but they did not specify their nationalities.

Several militant groups, including the Afghan Taliban and al Qaeda, have a presence in Pakistan's northwestern ethnic Pashtun regions, taking advantage of a porous border with Afghanistan to conduct cross-border attacks, or plot violence elsewhere.

North Waziristan is also an important base area for the Haqqani network, an Afghan militant faction allied with the Taliban which the United States says is one of its deadliest adversaries in Afghanistan.

While the Haqqani faction says it no longer needs a sanctuary in North Waziristan and has made enough battlefield gains in Afghanistan to stay there, it is known to still operate in the Pakistani border region.

A Pashtun tribal elder said militants usually avoided gathering, limiting groups to three or four people to minimize losses in the event of a drone attack. But they had dropped their guard recently.

"It has been freezing cold in the last few days and then there were no drones for some time. That's why the militants started living together and suffered heavy losses," the elder, who declined to be identified, told Reuters.

The use of the unmanned aircraft over Pakistan is opposed by most members of the public and Pakistani politicians, who regard the attacks as violations of sovereignty that produce unacceptable civilian casualties.

But despite its public stance, Pakistan has quietly supported the drone program since President Barack Obama ramped up air strikes after taking office in 2009.

(Additional reporting by Jibran Ahmad in PESHAWAR and Saud Mehsud in DERA ISMAIL KHAN; Writing by Qasim Nauman; Editing by Serena Chaudhry and Robert Birsel)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
beancube2101 wrote:
To counter drone attack, we need to know their base and multiple mid-air flooding devices to survey normal signal levels in that direction. You have to establish a base signal level when no drone is coming into the air and then when there is any level change alarms should be activated to verify what caused that change. Pakistan needs to modify equipments for astronomy and amplify signals for digital analysis to build an anti-drone defense system.

Feb 08, 2012 12:45am EST  --  Report as abuse
Free-Speech wrote:
No mention of this being illegal under international law….

I guess Reuters is as useless as the UN in this regard!

Feb 08, 2012 4:29am EST  --  Report as abuse
malowski wrote:
No mention of this being illegal under international law….

Because whether it is or isnt is debatable, it likely isnt considering the pakistan government supports it.

Feb 08, 2012 8:36am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.