Judge dismisses suit accusing SeaWorld of enslaving whales

Wed Feb 8, 2012 10:44pm EST

Related Topics

(Reuters) - A federal judge on Wednesday threw out an animal rights group's lawsuit accusing SeaWorld of enslaving captive killer whales, ruling that orcas had no standing to seek the same constitutional rights as people.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, or PETA, had accused the chain of aquatic theme parks of violating the rights of whales under the 13th Amendent of the U.S. Constitution, which abolished slavery in the United States.

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in San Diego, listed five performing orcas at SeaWorld's parks in California and Florida - Tilikum, Katina, Corky, Kasatka and Ulises - as plaintiffs in the complaint.

"The only reasonable interpretation of the 13th Amendment's plain language is that it applies to persons, and not to non-persons such as orcas," U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Miller wrote in his ruling.

"Both historic and contemporary sources reveal that the term 'slavery' and 'involuntary servitude' refer only to persons," the judge added.

The 13th Amendment was enacted in 1865, the year the U.S. Civil War ended.

Legal experts previously denounced as frivolous the PETA lawsuit, which had sought a court order requiring SeaWorld to release the five killer whales to a "suitable habitat."

David Steinberg, a professor at the Thomas Jefferson School of Law in San Diego, told Reuters when the lawsuit was filed in October that it was "demeaning (to) the integrity and humanity of people who were owned as slaves."

Virginia-based PETA has staked out a number of controversial positions in the past, in seeking to advance the cause of animal rights.

In 2003, the Anti-Defamation League accused PETA of trivializing the deaths of Jews in World War Two with a campaign that compared the meat industry to the Holocaust.

Colleen O'Brien, a spokeswoman for PETA, said in a statement that her organization would regroup as a result of the dismissal of what it called "this historic first case" on behalf of orcas.

"Today's decision does not change the fact that the orcas who once lived naturally wild and free, are today kept as slaves by SeaWorld," O'Brien said.

Miller said in his ruling that animals did have legal rights under state and federal statutes, including criminal laws.

He added the "goal" of PETA attorneys who brought the lawsuit "to protect the welfare of orcas is laudable," even if the 13th Amendment was not the correct way to approach the case.

(Reporting By Alex Dobuzinskis; Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Peter Cooney)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
Beladisovsky wrote:
Can Ms. O’Brien be quoted as having spoken directly with the orcas’ representative?

Feb 09, 2012 9:36am EST  --  Report as abuse
8myear wrote:
I don’t beleive it. PETA actually lost. Maybe there’s hope for America after all. Those people are nutjobs.

Feb 09, 2012 10:06am EST  --  Report as abuse
mcdanger wrote:
He should have forced PETA to pay the legal fees of Seaworld.

Feb 09, 2012 10:38am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.