Sponsored Links

UPDATE 1-Health insurers question Obama birth control plan

Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:53pm EST

By Lewis Krauskopf

Feb 10 (Reuters) - U.S. health insurers said on Friday they feared President Barack Obama had set a new precedent by making them responsible for providing free birth control to employees of religious groups as he sought to defuse an election-year landmine.

Obama on Friday announced the policy shift in an effort to accommodate religious organizations, such as Catholic hospitals and universities, whose leaders are outraged by a new rule that would have required them to offer free contraceptive coverage to employees.

Instead, the Obama administration ordered insurers to provide workers at religious-affiliated institutions with free family planning if they request it, without involving their employer at all. Insurance industry officials said the abrupt shift raised questions over how that requirement would be implemented.

"We are concerned about the precedent this proposed rule would set," said Robert Zirkelbach, spokesman for America's Health Insurance Plans, the industry's trade group. "As we learn more about how this rule would be operationalized, we will provide comments through the regulatory process."

Zirkelbach said insurers "have long offered contraceptive coverage to employers as part of comprehensive, preventive benefits that aim to improve patient health and reduce health care cost growth."

Employers who have signed on for such health plans in the past paid part of the cost of birth control prescriptions, while their employees also bore some of the expense through co-payments.

Aetna, the third-largest U.S. health insurer, said that it would comply with the policy but needed "to study the mechanics of this unprecedented decision before we can understand how it will be implemented and how it will impact our customers."

An Aetna spokeswoman said the company "did not have any direct input into the actual policy decisions that were made."

When asked about the insurer concerns, the White House cited a report from the U.S. Health and Human Services Department that estimates the costs of providing free birth control can be offset by reducing expenses associated with unintended pregnancies.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
Chalupa wrote:
No such thing as a free lunch.

Feb 10, 2012 5:16pm EST  --  Report as abuse
stan2234 wrote:
No condom, no sex. Women do not need free contraception, and I shouldn’t have to pay for it. If it’s related to health issues, then what’s wrong with a co-pay? We have co-pays for other health services. Why does contraception need to be free? I’ll never need it, I don’t want to pay for it. And pls don’t talk about Viagra. I’m not in favor of that being part of insurance either. Pay for your erection out of your own pocket. It’s not a health issue.

Feb 10, 2012 5:22pm EST  --  Report as abuse
stan2234 wrote:
test test test

Feb 10, 2012 5:25pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.