Malaysia deports Saudi blogger behind Prophet Mohammad tweets

KUALA LUMPUR Sun Feb 12, 2012 4:30am EST

KUALA LUMPUR (Reuters) - Malaysia deported a Saudi Arabian blogger on Sunday, police said, despite fears voiced by human rights groups that he could face execution in his home country over Twitter comments he made that were deemed insulting to the Prophet Mohammad.

Hamza Kashgari, a 23-year-old columnist, sparked outrage in the oil-rich kingdom with comments posted on the Prophet's birthday a week ago that led some Islamic clerics to call for him to face the death penalty.

Kashgari fled the country, but was arrested by police in majority-Muslim Malaysia on Thursday as he transited through Kuala Lumpur international airport.

"The Saudi writer was repatriated to his home country this Sunday morning," a police spokesman told Reuters. "This is an internal Saudi matter that we cannot comment on."

Malaysia has a close affinity with many Middle Eastern nations through their shared religion. The Southeast Asian nation is also a U.S. ally and a leading global voice for moderate Islam, meaning that the decision to extradite Kashgari is certain to be controversial.

"Saudi clerics have already made up their mind that Kashgari is an apostate who must face punishment," Christoph Wilcke, senior Middle East researcher at Human Rights Watch, said in a statement on Friday.

"The Malaysian government should not be complicit in sealing Kashgari's fate by sending him back."

Kashgari's lawyer in Malaysia, Mohammad Noor, told Reuters by telephone that he had obtained a court order to prevent the deportation, but had not been allowed to see his client.

"If the government of Malaysia deports him to Saudi Arabia, disrespecting the court order, this is clearly contempt of court, unlawful and unacceptable," he said.

The Star newspaper quoted Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein as saying that Kashgari had been repatriated and that the charges against him would be decided by Saudi authorities.

"Malaysia has a longstanding arrangement by which individuals wanted by one country are extradited when detained by the other," he was quoted as saying.

Blasphemy is a crime punishable by execution under Saudi Arabia's strict interpretation of Islamic sharia law. It is not a capital crime in Malaysia.

Reuters could not verify Kashgari's comments because he later deleted them, but media reported that one of them reflected his contradictory views of the Prophet - that he both loved and hated him.

Kashgari later said in an interview that he was being made a "scapegoat for a larger conflict" over his comments.

(Additional reporting by Niluksi Koswanage in Kuala Lumpur and Asma Alsharif in Dubai, Editing by Ron Popeski)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
capitalP wrote:
An anti-US remark/blog is going to lead the guy in a similar situation. One calls it threat against freedom and the other calls it blasphemy. The outcome is the same in both the cases. Looks like US and Saudi’s are brothers-in-arms.

Feb 12, 2012 5:07am EST  --  Report as abuse
DeepTiver wrote:
@capitalP: That isn’t even close to being true. Freedom of speech is protected by the US’s Constitution. There are literally tens of thousands of bloggers, print and media commentators, and public speeches by people saying every day that they both love and hate the US. None of them are in danger of being arrested and executed like this poor guy is. This article has nothing to do with the US, but if you want to bring it up and go trolling, get your facts straight and at least turn it into a valid argument. Just because you’re rabid doesn’t mean you’re right.

Feb 12, 2012 8:27am EST  --  Report as abuse
StevenFeldman wrote:
Insulting? I’ll tell you what I find insulting:

That Reuters refers to Mohammad, the founder of a religion and religious tenets that are not held to be true by 85 percent of the global population as “the Prophet Mohammad” (in caps).

Does Reuters refer in its stories to “the Prophet Moses”? “The Messiah Jesus”?

No.

Then, why “the Prophet Mohammad”?

Because Reuters correspondents are as cowed by Muslim intimidation and threats of violence as the Saudis want this blogger to be.

Reuters is a disgrace.

Feb 12, 2012 10:56am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.