The dome of the Capitol is reflected in a puddle in Washington February 17, 2012.REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Another debt ceiling debacle could sink the economy

Last year's Congressional debt standoff hurt consumer confidence more than the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Betsey Johnson and Justin Wolfers write. This time could be worse.  Read more at Counterparties  

Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.

Fed minutes to clarify extent of discord on easing

U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke testifies before a Senate Budget Committee hearing on the outlook for the U.S. Monetary and Fiscal Policy on Capitol Hill in Washington, February 7, 2012.   REUTERS/Jason Reed

U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke testifies before a Senate Budget Committee hearing on the outlook for the U.S. Monetary and Fiscal Policy on Capitol Hill in Washington, February 7, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed

WASHINGTON | Sun Feb 12, 2012 11:54am EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A number of top Federal Reserve officials likely saw a need for additional monetary easing at the central bank's meeting last month, although there are few signals the central bank will move soon.

Minutes from the Fed's January meeting, which will be released on Wednesday, should offer more insight than usual into where officials stand on the question of whether more bond purchases are warranted to help a still-frail economy.

While the minutes always give a flavor of the policy debate, the central bank for the first time will provide "qualitative" details on officials' views on the Fed's near-record $2.9 trillion balance sheet.

This new information -- a counterpart to the first-ever interest rate projections released last month -- could suggest a greater willingness to ease further than was evidenced following the meeting. Last month, the Fed said it would likely leave rates near zero until at least late 2014, but offered no details on how it should handle its asset holdings.

The prospects for further easing appeared to be dampened by the latest employment figures, which showed a healthier job market than economists had expected. Still, many feel the economy is unlikely to gain enough vigor this year to satisfy the Fed, and they look for a third round of quantitative easing, probably through purchases of mortgage bonds.

"I doubt the qualitative information from participants on the balance sheet would sway decisively on the near-term prospect of QE3," said Thomas Lam, an economist at OSK-DMG. "While the hurdle for QE3 seems lower, I don't view this policy option as imminent at this time."

Speaking before a group of home builders on Friday, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke stayed away from any explicit references to monetary policy, but made clear he still does not see the pace of economic growth as sufficient or satisfactory.

"The state of housing has been an impediment to a faster recovery," he said. "We need to continue to develop and implement policies that will help the housing sector get back on its feet."

The projections from Fed officials on when interest rates should rise off the floor were all over the place, ranging from this year to 2016. Given varying appetites within the Fed's policy committee for expanding or shrinking the central bank's portfolio, the minutes will likely put even more daylight between inflation hawks and doves.

Analysts are not expecting any hard data on balance sheet expectations but rather broad-brush descriptions of policymakers' leanings. The minutes could say, for instance, that some members favor additional stimulus now, while others would rather take a wait-and-see approach.

There is also a risk that the markets could get a hawkish surprise, for instance, if some officials appear to be making the case for near-term asset sales.

"It will be an interesting trading day when this 'qualitative information' begins to include ruminations about when to start shrinking the nearly $3 trillion balance sheet and whether such shrinkage will happen through passive asset run-off or active asset sales," said Dana Saporta, an economist at Credit Suisse.

Bernanke has said that when the Fed chooses to tighten policy it will first raise the interest it pays on bank reserves, currently at 0.25 percent, only later resorting to selling some of the assets it accumulated in response to the financial crisis.

But not all officials may agree.

(Reporting by Pedro Nicolaci da Costa; Editing by Diane Craft and Maureen Bavdek)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
brotherkenny4 wrote:
Even if the Fed is concerned with the economy, they are likely not concerned with the what will happen to the bulk of the american people. I suspect they are just trying to figure out how to help business get whatever money is left out in the country that the wealthy don’t already have. Our government is too corrupt to care. Republicans will tell you that it is because we have too many high paid federal employees. That is a lie. The cost of the federal employees is a pitance in comparison to what goes to industry in tax breaks, subsidies, and R&D funding. Even more expensive is our spending on defense, social security and medicaid and medicare. These are the three big costs in our budget. The politicians desire to stay in office and participate in the graft is such that they will never do what should be done. If you fall for any of the garbage coming out of any politician your just dilusional. They’ll play on your hates and fears and get themselves rich. Don’t get me wrong we could certainly eliminate some government, and that would eliminate some federal employees, But if you buy that as being the problem your just brainwashed. Certain parts of the government protect you from total slavery. In addition, the state and local governments are far more intrusive and evil than the federal government. Yet, because it is the fedral government that does provide some protection for you, the people, it is the enemy that the republicans have identified. All wealth comes from labor and the republicans are planning on getting the fruits of your labor for themselves.

Feb 12, 2012 4:03pm EST  --  Report as abuse
SanPa wrote:
Boskinized BLS (abbrev.: Boskin’s BuLlSh..) inflation figures might look reasonable, but that inflation in the real world is rapidly making paupers of savers.

Feb 12, 2012 4:53pm EST  --  Report as abuse
AZWarrior wrote:
I think the FED should tear up all the bonds that they bought by printing money. Come on Ben, be a pal. In one day you could greatly reduce the national debt. We aren’t going to pay it back anyway. Go ahead … just eat it for the greater good.

Feb 12, 2012 4:56pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.