UPDATE 1-White House defends deficit, wrong time for austerity

Sun Feb 12, 2012 12:26pm EST

* Obama budget defers significant action on deficit

* Now not the time for austerity - White House's Lew

By Alister Bull

Washington, Feb 12 (Reuters) - President Barack Obama's chief of staff, Jacob Lew, defended his boss on Sunday for failing to cut the U.S. budget deficit, making the election-year argument that now was the wrong time to impose austerity measures that could sap an economic recovery.

Republicans have slammed Democrat Obama for laying out a budget plan that raises taxes on the rich, which they view as designed to help his campaign for re-election on Nov. 6, rather than controlling the growth of the U.S. deficit and debt.

But Lew, speaking on Sunday television news shows on the eve of Obama's 2013 budget proposal to Congress, said the plan would outline $4 trillion in 10 year deficit reductions, alongside measures to deliver essential suport to near-term growth.

"I think there is pretty broad agreement that the time for austerity is not today," Lew, Obama's budget chief until few weeks ago, told NBC's "Meet the Press".

This was also why Congress ought to pass a payroll tax cut extension before it expires in two weeks' time, he said.

Obama's budget will request over $800 billion in multi-year spending for job creation and infrastructure programs, including tax breaks for companies and individuals worth more than $300 billion in 2012 if passed into law.

Congress is free to ignore the president's proposals and Republicans have said Obama's budget will be dead on arrival.

"Jack Lew did the full tour of all five Sunday shows this morning, failing on each show to articulate how their upcoming budget would lift the crushing burden of debt," said Gerrit Lansing, spokesman for House of Representatives Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, a Republican.

The budget, which will delivered to Congress on Monday, projects the deficit at $1.33 trillion this fiscal year or 8.5 percent of gross domestic product, declining to $901 billion, or 5.5 percent of GDP, in 2013.

DEFICIT PLEDGE

Obama pledged in 2009 to have halved the deficit by next year, and his failure to deliver has provided Republicans with ammunition as they seek to deny him a second term by portraying him as old style tax and spend liberal.

"On this issue - the debt - this president has been completely AWOL. Republicans have had to fight tooth and nail for every dime in savings we've secured," Mitch McConnell, the top Republican in the U.S. Senate, said on Thursday.

Lew, however, argued that Obama's deficit promise was made before he truly understood the depth of the recession he had inherited from Republican President George W. Bush.

"When we took office, the economy was falling so fast that the first thing we had to do was put a bottom in ... It cost money in terms of lost revenue and slower economic growth. We're on track now," Lew told ABC News.

The White House said the funding gap will shrink to 2.8 percent of GDP by 2018, below the 3 percent/GDP threshold that credit rating agencies and investors see as the goal to stabilize the growth in national debt as a share of the economy.

Lew said Congress and the administration are working to see if a compromise can be reached over extending the payroll tax cut for 160 million Americans, which will expire on Feb. 29 unless Congress acts.

"They have two weeks now to do the important business so they don't get in the way of our economic recovery," he told NBC. The White House estimates extending the payroll tax cut for all of 2012 could add a percentage point to growth this year.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
crbob wrote:
To the Obama administration austerity is “spending”, now is not the time to spend when we have a debt of almost 18 trillion dollars and a budget deficit of 1.8 trillion…..we need first to make all states right to work states, then corporations can bring back their overseas jobs that the unions have forced overseas, that is part of austerity, then we need to disband the Federal Reserve which is bleeding our country with foreign banker preferences, and bring back the gold standard for our currency, that is part of austerity, there are many other ways rather than spending money we don’t have…….

Feb 12, 2012 1:34pm EST  --  Report as abuse
ronMc wrote:
Three years ago, Obama and Germany’s Merkel had a major rift over the best way to deal with the worldwide economic collapse. Obama argued for stimulus; Merkel strongly disagreed, arguing that fiscal restraint was the proper policy to reduce unemployment. The U.S. unemployment rate shot higher, and without the suspicious recent decision not to count over a million out of work as unemployed, our current rate remains at 11%. Merkel’s strategy led to a rapid reduction in Germany’s unemployment rate. Doesn’t this suggest that Merkel’s strategy was far superior, and that our current mess is largely due to Obama’s poor handling of a challenging situation?

Feb 12, 2012 1:53pm EST  --  Report as abuse
slimj091 wrote:
“Obama pledged in 2009 to have halved the deficit by next year, and his failure to deliver has provided Republicans with ammunition as they seek to deny him a second term by portraying him as old style tax and spend liberal.”

of course because the republican controlled congress, and senate won’t allow him to cut the deficit. doing so would make Obama’s campaign stronger this election year. which is why they will let the payroll tax cut expire.. so they can blame it on him saying things like “well Obama just raised your taxes middle america… vote for us instead”.

Feb 12, 2012 3:10pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.