The dome of the Capitol is reflected in a puddle in Washington February 17, 2012.REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Another debt ceiling debacle could sink the economy

Last year's Congressional debt standoff hurt consumer confidence more than the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Betsey Johnson and Justin Wolfers write. This time could be worse.  Read more at Counterparties  

Judge allows Sandusky visits from some grandchildren

Related Topics

Jerry Sandusky, former Penn State defensive coordinator, speaks with the media outside the Centre County Courthouse in Bellefonte, Pennsylvania February 10, 2012.  REUTERS/Pat Little

Jerry Sandusky, former Penn State defensive coordinator, speaks with the media outside the Centre County Courthouse in Bellefonte, Pennsylvania February 10, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Pat Little

HARRISBURG, Pennsylvania | Mon Feb 13, 2012 6:44pm EST

HARRISBURG, Pennsylvania (Reuters) - A judge on Monday granted nearly all requests from ex-Penn State coach Jerry Sandusky, allowing most of his 14 grandchildren to visit him under house arrest and securing a local jury for his child sex abuse trial.

Judge John Cleland of Centre County Court in Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, also denied a prosecution effort to keep Sandusky within the walls of his State College home after a teacher at a neighboring elementary school complained he was standing on his deck, watching students on the playground.

Sandusky, 68, is charged with 52 criminal counts stemming from accusations he molested 10 boys between 1994 and 2008. He has been confined to his home since December. The trial is set to start in May.

Sandusky's indictment in November 2011 rocked the collegiate sports world and led to the dismissal of Penn State's iconic head football coach, Joe Paterno, who died on January 22. University President Graham Spanier also lost his job.

Sandusky's lawyer, Joe Amendola, said in a statement the Sandusky family was pleased by the judge's decisions but acknowledged "difficult legal battles lie ahead of us. We continue to work very hard in preparing Jerry's defense with the ultimate goal of obtaining Jerry's acquittal following his trial."

Weighing the elementary school's concerns as well as complaints by neighbors that Sandusky was in his driveway shoveling snow, the judge ruled the prosecution's request to keep him indoors rather than simply on his own property was not warranted.

"No evidence was presented that at any time the defendant made any effort to contact any of the children by signaling or calling to them or that he made any gestures directed toward them or that he acted in an inappropriate way whatsoever," the judge ruled.

"The generalized concerns of parents, while understandable, cannot justify additional bail restrictions."

In 30 pages of rulings issued on Monday, Cleland also allowed Sandusky to travel to the office of his lawyer, Joe Amendola, to prepare his defense, as long as he provides at least 36 hours notice to the court.

Sandusky was partially successful in his effort to learn more about witnesses against him. The judge ruled the prosecution must provide the time, date, location and accuser's age at the time of any alleged offense but not the particular acts Sandusky is accused of committing or the names, addresses and ages of witnesses.

A defense request to get any early look at grand jury testimony to prepare for trial was deferred to another judge who supervised the grand jury that indicted Sandusky last fall.

Under Cleland's ruling, Sandusky is allowed to meet in his home with 11 of his 14 grandchildren. Cleland deferred a decision on the remaining three grandchildren to a judge overseeing their parents' divorce, as their mother, Sandusky's daughter-in-law, objected to the request.

Sandusky's lawyer said in a statement the daughter-in-law had accused Sandusky of two incidents of abuse, at least one of which involved her 5-year-old son, but that county child welfare officials last month determined both allegations were unfounded.

The judge granted Sandusky permission for other forms of contact, such as telephone calls and electronic communication like email and Skype, with all 14 grandchildren.

Cleland also denied a prosecution request for a jury made up of people from outside Centre County, home of Penn State. The prosecution had argued that a jury made up of local residents would place the case in "peril" because they are too emotionally and financially intertwined with the university.

The judge acknowledged "the extensive involvement of Penn State in the life of citizens of Centre County, and the existence of the extraordinary mass media coverage of this case." The judge said he was convinced a fair jury could be selected.

"The presumption should be in favor of at least making an effort to select a fair and impartial jury in the county where the defendant has been charged," the judge said.

A spokesman for the attorney general's office, Nils Frederiksen, declined to comment on the judge's decision, saying, "The rulings are being reviewed."

Amendola was not available for comment beyond his written statements.

As a result of the scandal, the school's athletic director Tim Curley, later placed on administrative leave, and finance official Gary Schultz, who later resigned, were charged with lying to the grand jury and failing to report the allegations to police.

In a separate court filing on Monday, Curley cited a two-year statute of limitations when he asked a judge to throw out the criminal charge, brought in January 2012, of failing to tell police about a 2002 allegation that Sandusky sexually assaulted a boy in the locker room showers. Curley also asked the judge to bar any grand jury testimony from Paterno, citing his death, a move he said could eliminate the perjury charge too.

(Editing By Barbara Goldberg, Daniel Trotta and Greg McCune)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (12)
feudi wrote:
His grandchildren all said eeewww!!!

Feb 13, 2012 10:55am EST  --  Report as abuse
wontolla wrote:
So are the son and daughter in-laws okay with there children visiting him? I hope they have a say in it. Not like this state where there is this idiotic thing called “grandparents rights”.

Feb 13, 2012 11:05am EST  --  Report as abuse
Great. Judge John Cleland is either stupid, insane or already bought. After all, it *is* PA.

Feb 13, 2012 11:29am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.