Sponsored Links

Flights by U.S. airlines hit 10-year low

Related Topics

Two ground crew members walk past a United Airlines airplane as it sits at a gate at Newark Liberty International Airport in Newark, New Jersey, June 18, 2011. REUTERS/Gary Hershorn

Two ground crew members walk past a United Airlines airplane as it sits at a gate at Newark Liberty International Airport in Newark, New Jersey, June 18, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Gary Hershorn

WASHINGTON | Tue Feb 14, 2012 6:22pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. airlines in 2011 operated the fewest number of flights since the hijack attacks on New York and Washington depressed air travel and accelerated the industry's worst-ever financial downturn, government figures on Tuesday showed.

The Transportation Department said major airlines, their chief low-cost competitors and the biggest regional carriers, recorded 6.08 million departures last year. Takeoffs were not that low since 2002, when they totaled 5.27 million.

Reduced operations and good summer weather, especially in the East, helped airlines post a 79 percent on-time rating in 2011, unchanged from the previous two years.

The overall number of flights by U.S. airlines have steadily declined since 2008 when the recession dampened travel demand. Most recently, stubbornly high fuel prices have prompted airlines to further cut capacity to reduce costs and maintain higher fares.

The industry operating figures were released as President Barack Obama signed into law $63 billion legislation authorizing guaranteed funding of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) through 2015.

The FAA oversees U.S. air traffic operations at more than 400 airports.

The measure approved by Congress last week also includes funding for the next steps in transforming the air traffic network from a radar-based system to one relying on satellites.

Proponents say the change will allow for more flights, better routing and fewer delays.

(Reporting By John Crawley; Editing by Bernard Orr)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
wilderbeast wrote:
taxpayer subsides abound for airports and fuel to say the least. when i used to fly before insulting inspections and horrible authoritarian air cops, the ticket was affordable but no more. Now despite subsides the corporations require the kings ransom to use their subsidezed product. flying used to be fun and an adventure now it’s a horror. i wont fly, i will be glad to see the airlines disappear.thats what greed brings. take a boat or drive. to hell with them

Feb 14, 2012 6:12pm EST  --  Report as abuse
rootword wrote:
your kidding right? a steady decline? resssion dampened demand? where in the article is the unstated obvious? it is a service indusrty? right? might you consider that the over all poor service, ever increasing “fees” vs perceived value, or poor accommodations/comfort in flight? Not to mention an inherently ludicrous pricing structure per flight vs alternative means of transport as potential ‘reasons” for declining demand.
Tying the FAA funding to the ebb/flow of{poor} commerical serivice is a disservice to the agency. They provide invaluable service to GA aircraft keeping those of us who choose not to fly commerically very informed and safe….glad they are being updated!!!

Feb 14, 2012 6:19pm EST  --  Report as abuse
firehavok wrote:
Flying has never been the cheapest means of travel, but it was at one point a convenient form of transportation especially when going crossed-country… Now when I pack all of my luggage and family into the car, instead of driving to the airport, I just drive to my travel destination and skip the invasive, greedy, and poorly serving middleman that is the airport. I would rather line the pockets of the tourist attractions along the way of my journey than the airlines who have forgotten who pay their checks. They may decide to forget all together who their original consumer was with the lucrative subsidies they are getting. If I was payed a million dollars not to grow my crop of corn, id just take the money too. These greedy sobs are rate jacking to promote government assistance and subsidies. Let it fail and let the train/transit industry come back. At least you can play words with friends on a train at take off. Props Alec.

Feb 14, 2012 9:22pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.