Obama to seek $5 billion to transform teaching profession

Wed Feb 15, 2012 12:03am EST

Related Topics

(Reuters) - U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan will deliver a scathing critique of teacher training colleges on Wednesday as he unveils a $5 billion initiative to transform the teaching profession from top to bottom.

In remarks scheduled for delivery at 3:30 p.m. EST (2030 GMT), Duncan will argue that the profession needs to become more selective, offer more consistent training, evaluate teacher effectiveness more critically and reward the best teachers with salaries on par with doctors and lawyers.

"Many of our schools of education are mediocre at best. Many teachers are poorly trained and isolated in their classrooms," Duncan will say in remarks prepared for an online town hall meeting with educators.

"No other profession carries a greater burden for securing America's future. And no other profession deserves more respect," added Duncan, who once headed Chicago's public schools.

But his ambitious goals may run into major roadblocks.

President Barack Obama's administration wants states to compete for a share in $5 billion in federal grants to overhaul their teacher training colleges and create new standards for teacher evaluations. But that fund is subject to congressional approval, and Republicans have already served notice they intend to fight new spending initiatives.

All four Republican candidates seeking to challenge Obama in November's election have called for greatly reducing the federal role in education.

On the state level, it is unclear where legislators will find the resources to raise teacher salaries or offer sizeable bonuses to the most effective teachers, as Duncan has repeatedly urged. Many states have cut tens of millions in funding for primary and secondary education in recent years as they grapple with enormous budget deficits.

Duncan's rebuke of teacher colleges is also likely to arouse opposition from the institutions themselves. His description of many schools as ineffective rankles teacher educators such as Michael Morehead, dean of New Mexico State University's College of Education.

'MISPERCEPTION'

In recent years, Morehead said teacher colleges had dramatically boosted their standards. Decades ago, he said, anyone with even a mediocre grade-point average in high school could get into a teacher college, flounder through the courses and yet still graduate as a teacher.

Now, he said, many schools were more selective in their admissions and required hundreds of hours of apprenticeship, or student teaching, before granting a diploma. Many states also require teachers to pass one or more licensing exams before taking charge of a classroom.

"It's certainly a misperception" that teacher colleges are failing, Morehead said. "Yet that's what is consistently expressed."

But Tim Knowles, who directs the University of Chicago's Urban Education Institute, said reforms in teacher education were sorely needed. About half of new teachers who go to work in urban schools leave the profession within five years. Many of them complain they were not prepared for their responsibilities. Knowles said some new teachers had spent as little as six weeks in apprenticeships before being put in front of their own classrooms.

Knowles said he hoped the Obama initiative would prod states to rank teacher colleges by how well they prepare their graduates, how long those graduates remain in the teaching profession and how much impact they have on their students, as measured by standardized test scores.

Otherwise, he said, it was hard to tell how effective they were. "Right now, it's a total free-for-all," he said.

The Obama initiative is called RESPECT, an acronym for Recognizing Educational Success, Professional Excellence and Collaborative Teaching.

The American Federation of Teachers, a national teachers' union, has issued a general statement of support for Obama's education reform policies but has not commented on the specific details of the Duncan proposal.

(Reporting By Stephanie Simon in Denver; Editing by Peter Cooney)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
jdog777 wrote:
on par with doctors and lawyers…. PLEASE. Even College professors don’t hold a candle to most doctors and lawyers in the private sector. A huge share of doctors and lawyers are small business people and employ many people… creating jobs and wealth.

Feb 15, 2012 12:46am EST  --  Report as abuse
cherry_trees wrote:
So Obama is going to buy even more teacher union votes with $5 billion in borrowed money. Anyone want to bet that not a dime goes to teacher training, it will go to an Obama crony that starts a training company and then goes bankrupt.

But we already have zillions of unemployed and underemployed with advanced education. So, this is Obama’s solution to what exactly?

Obama already exempted 10 states from No Child Left Behind so that teachers would NOT have to be evaluated. Obungles sure is awesome, we better give him another 4 years…

Feb 15, 2012 1:46am EST  --  Report as abuse
Whiteathame wrote:
Yes!!!! By all means let the libs-in-government dictate what public school teachers should learn, be and do. After all, they are our leaders, our experts-at-everything, etc. B.S!!!

Return control of education to the states and locally elected school boards! Keep federal mitts off public eductaion unless you want a coterie of politicians with roots in Chicago, Minneapolis or Boston setting teacher and teaching requirements in Indianapolis, Annapolis and Peoria! To control the pursestrings is to control the output. Give the $5 billion to the education departments of our states and territories. Better still, leave it in the taxpayer’s pockets!

Isn’t America sick of federal control over it’s public schools. The feds are the ones who gave us “no child left behind”….. maybe that’s why Johnny can’t read!

Feb 15, 2012 7:56am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.