Postal Service releases plan to reverse losses

Thu Feb 16, 2012 7:13pm EST

A woman walks into a post office which is due to close in Los Angeles, California January 30, 2012. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson

A woman walks into a post office which is due to close in Los Angeles, California January 30, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Lucy Nicholson

(Reuters) - The Postal Service warned it could become a long-term burden on taxpayers absent legislative change, as the cash-strapped agency put pressure on Congress to allow it to end Saturday delivery and to tap into a retirement-account surplus.

The mail carrier said in a new five-year turnaround plan released on Thursday that multiple changes are needed to stave off billions of dollars in future annual losses.

The Postal Service does not receive taxpayer funds. It has been losing money for years due to shrinking mail volume, high labor costs and a crippling annual payment to prefund retiree health benefits.

The five-year business plan, submitted to Congress, details steps to reduce annual costs by $20 billion by 2015, the amount Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe has said must come out of the budget if the agency is to return to profitability.

Lawmakers in Congress have been working for months on legislation to revive the mail agency, but they remain deeply divided on how to do it. Postal officials say without action from Congress, the service cannot be profitable.

"In the absence of legislative reform that quickly enables meaningful operational changes and cost reductions, the Postal Service could incur annual losses as great as $18.2 billion by 2015," Donahoe warned in a letter to lawmakers.

"These prospective losses would be unsustainable and would cause the Postal Service to become a long-term burden to the American taxpayer."

The Postal Service lost $3.3 billion in its most recent quarter, much of it due to the benefits prefunding payment. Officials say the agency could be unable to borrow money by this fall, at which point it could default on payments to the federal government in order to keep delivering the mail.

In the new document, drafted with help from General Motors restructuring adviser Evercore Partners, the Postal Service repeated plans to reduce its workforce by leaving empty jobs unfilled and to close post offices and processing facilities.

The agency also said it needs to deliver mail five days a week instead of six, stop the annual prefunding payments, manage its own health plans and transition older employees to Medicare.

These steps, plus the return over two years of about an $11 billion surplus in a postal retirement account, would result in a profit of $2.1 billion for 2012, the document said.

"What we've laid out here ... is not a menu of options from which we can select. In fact, we need the whole menu to be accomplished in order to return the Postal Service to where it needs to be," Chief Financial Officer Joe Corbett said during a conference call with reporters.

The Postal Service also said it would like to consider pricing actions such as raising stamp prices to 50 cents apiece.

Many of these changes require permission from Congress. Committees in the House of Representatives and the Senate have passed postal bills, but neither full house has voted.

Donahoe has said neither of the bills goes far enough to allow the agency to return to profitability.

The prefunding has been divisive. A bipartisan Senate bill would spread out the payments over a longer time frame, but many favor ending it entirely. Others argue ending the payments would leave taxpayers on the hook for future retiree benefits.

Lawmakers from both parties have come out against closing post offices and eliminating Saturday mail delivery, though both of the leading bills would allow these with some limitations.

"Any plan that calls for cutting Saturday delivery, downsizing our networks and slowing delivery will not restore USPS to profitability," the National Association of Letter Carriers said in a statement on Thursday.

A recent Reuters analysis found that 80 percent of the 3,800 post offices under consideration for closure are located in sparsely populated rural areas. About one-third of the offices fall in communities with limited or no wired broadband Internet access.

(Reporting By Emily Stephenson; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
OneOfTheSheep wrote:
Cut deliveries to twice a week, once on Monday and once on Thursday. Cut counter service to five days a week and toss union rules that prevent supervisory personnel from “clerk work” at the counters at peak times, for passport issuance, etc. and when people are sick.

In other words, do what any “for profit” business would do without union “featherbedding”. Oh, yeah…reduce pensions to a rate commensurate with private industry and retirement to an age or service years requirement commensurate with private industry.

What’s so difficult about that? Oh, yeah. The union.

Feb 17, 2012 12:37am EST  --  Report as abuse
oi812 wrote:
Why not deliver mail every other day-I can do without the daily junk mail and have the post office cut their workforce in half

Feb 17, 2012 12:08pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.