UPDATE 1-Iran wants more UN nuclear talks after Tehran stalemate

Fri Feb 24, 2012 8:03am EST

Related Topics

* U.N. nuclear watchdog reported failed Tehran talks

* Iranian envoy hopes for more meetings (Adds IAEA report due later on Friday, quote, detail)

By Fredrik Dahl

VIENNA, Feb 24 (Reuters) - Iran wants more talks with the U.N. nuclear watchdog, its ambassador to the body said, despite what one Western envoy called "very long and fruitless" negotiations this week on addressing suspicions about Tehran's atomic activities.

The relatively upbeat comments by Iran's ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) were in stark contrast to a terse statement issued by the U.N. agency on Wednesday after the two days of discussions in Tehran.

The Vienna-based agency is later on Friday expected to issue its latest quarterly report on Iran's nuclear programme, giving details on this week's meetings in Tehran and the overall status of the Islamic state's uranium enrichment drive, diplomats say.

The report to member states could form the basis for any diplomatic action against Iran at a March meeting of the IAEA's 35-nation board, which has the power to adopt resolutions and can report a country to the U.N. Security Council.

Iran's envoy to the IAEA stressed the need for dialogue, warning against any "provocation" that could jeopardise this.

"Our position is that we are going to continue the talks for cooperation with the agency and we hope that this process will be successfully going on," ambassador Ali Asghar Soltanieh said.

"We need a quiet environment, a calm environment to continue our professional work with the agency," he told Reuters late on Thursday.

The IAEA said no further meetings with Iran were planned, signalling frustration at the lack of progress in two rounds of talks this year.

The setback has increased fears of a spiral towards conflict between Iran and the West, and sent oil prices higher.

Western diplomats suspect Iran is merely seeking "talks about talks" in an attempt to ease outside pressure on the Islamic state while it presses ahead with nuclear work which the United States and its allies believe has military aims.

STONEWALL

Iran says nuclear weapons claims are baseless and its programme is aimed at electricity generation and medical needs.

"We try to be cooperative," said Soltanieh. "We are dealing with the questions and we are trying to remove ambiguities."

The IAEA said Iranian officials refused to grant it access to a military site crucial for its investigations and that there was no agreement on a way forward to clarify concerns that the Islamic Republic may be developing nuclear arms capability.

Western diplomats said Iran had continued to stonewall the senior IAEA team during the talks, in which the agency sought answers to intelligence pointing to nuclear weapons research and development.

"Essentially they had two very long and fruitless meetings," one Western envoy in Vienna said.

The Iranian side "systematically just claimed they have no clandestine programme and therefore any questions raised (about possible military dimensions to Iran's nuclear programme) were either incorrect or invalid", the diplomat added.

An IAEA report in November suggested Iran had pursued military nuclear technology. This helped to precipitate the latest sanctions by the European Union and United States.

One finding was information that Iran had built a large containment chamber at the Parchin military site near Tehran to conduct high-explosives tests. The U.N. agency said there were "strong indicators of possible weapon development".

Asked why Iran had not allowed the U.N. inspectors to visit Parchin, Soltanieh said: "For any visit and access there should be some sort of modality and agreement.

"It was assumed that after we agreed on the modality then access would be given. Since the modality was not concluded due to time constraints ... this was not possible." (Editing by Janet Lawrence)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
kafantaris wrote:
Iran faces a delicate issue. On the one hand it wants to show the world all it’s got and put it at ease, while on the other hand it fears that such show ‘n tell will give its enemies a roadmap to bomb it.
Saddam Hussein faced a similar dilemma ten years ago. Though he wanted the world to know he had nothing to hide, he also wanted to bluff his archenemy Iran into believing Iraq still had WMD.
Bluffing did not go well for Saddam, and it might not go well for Ahmadinejad.
But since the price tag for ridding Saddam proved high, maybe we ought to reflect what we are asking of Iran now. On the eve of a threatened attack, we are asking it to take us to the depths of its arsenal and show us all it’s got.
Such great expectations are a sign we have been talking to our friends too long and are in need of a broader perspective. Exactly when was the last time we asked Pakistan, India, China or Russia to show us their arsenal?
“But those countries are not advocating the destruction of Israel.”
True, but Israel is not a thorn on their side either.
Surely, however, we can see beyond the hyperboles and figure out their underlying purpose. Or have we forgotten that not all Iranians are thrilled with Ahmadinejad?
He sure hasn’t forgotten.
Nor has he forgotten that that his countrymen hate Israel even more. So he tells them that Israel will be wiped from the face of the earth. Expectantly, this nonsense unites them against a common enemy. It is even a diversion from the misery and isolation brought on by his theocratic regime.
Quite clever work by Ahmadinejad — and not a rial spent or a bullet fired.
So why are we letting the crazy talk about destroying Israel get us all worked-up — to the point of turning the world topsy-turvy again.
Can we not see the desperate attempts of an unpopular regime simply trying to hold on?

Feb 24, 2012 9:43am EST  --  Report as abuse
cinalray wrote:
It’s quite obvious that Iran is just buying time. While the talk is going, Iran will complete it’s nuclear goal. Can you imagine a fanatical country like Iran having a nuclear bomb?

Feb 24, 2012 9:52am EST  --  Report as abuse
The plain fact is that as long as the regime is in power they will continue to work toward building a nuclear weapon. Shia eschatology and nuclear weapons do not go well together.

We need to do everything we can to get the regime out of power. As with all non-democratic regimes, it is not legitimate and does not have the support of the Iranian people.

Feb 24, 2012 10:24am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.