Seven U.S. soldiers wounded after Afghan NATO base attacked

KUNDUZ/KABUL, Afghanistan Sun Feb 26, 2012 5:53pm EST

1 of 11. An Afghan policeman keeps watch at a check point in Kabul February 26, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Omar Sobhani

Related News

Related Topics

KUNDUZ/KABUL, Afghanistan (Reuters) - Seven U.S. military trainers were wounded on Sunday when a grenade was thrown at their base in northern Afghanistan, police said, as anti-Western fury deepened over the burning of the Koran at a NATO base.

Despite an apology from U.S. President Barack Obama, riots raged across the country for a sixth day on Sunday against the desecration of the Muslim holy book at a NATO air base at Bagram. Some protesters hoisted the white Taliban flag.

The Afghan Interior Ministry identified one of its employees as a suspect in the fatal shooting of two U.S. officers in its headquarters a day earlier, an attack that prompted NATO to recall its staff from ministries.

One civilian was killed, 15 more were wounded and three policemen injured in riots near the NATO base in northern Kunduz province, where the blast that wounded the Americans took place, regional police chief Samihullah Qatra told reporters.

NATO confirmed there had been an explosion outside one of its bases in northern Afghanistan, but declined to comment on casualties.

The protests have killed 30 people and wounded 200, including two other U.S. troops who were shot dead by an Afghan soldier who joined rallies in the country's east.

The Koran burnings could make it far harder for NATO forces to win the trust of the Afghan public as they try to stabilize the country ahead of the withdrawal of foreign combat troops at the end of 2014.

Afghan security sources identified Abdul Saboor, a 25-year-old police intelligence officer, as a suspect in the shooting of the Americans at close range inside the Interior Ministry.

In a statement to media, the ministry said: "An employee has been identified as a suspect and he has now fled. The Interior Ministry is trying to arrest the suspected individual."

NATO is supposed to be moving away from a combat role to an advise-and-assist mission as early as next year. That will require NATO to place more staff in Kabul's ministries.

CCTV footage showed that Saboor had access to the Command and Control Centre, tucked deep inside the ministry, where the slain Americans were found, security officials told Reuters on condition of anonymity.

The Taliban took responsibility for the attack, saying it was in retaliation for the burning of the Korans.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai repeated his plea for calm and restraint. "It is time to regain and preserve our calm, and not allow our enemies to misuse it," he told reporters, referring to the nationwide violence.

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (42)
ccharles wrote:
That the killer got away was no big suprise. Man our Forgien policy people suck.. Obama apologized faster for the Koran burning then about our own people he has said nothing. Wheres Clinton? off doing Israels dirty work stirring up stuff in the middle east.

Feb 26, 2012 8:27am EST  --  Report as abuse
kenradke11 wrote:
What a disgusting show of violence for a Koran that teaches about love and peace or does it? I have to question that. My Christian God taught me to live in peace and harmony and forgiveness. Of course though we are talking about a terrorist group who just loves excuses for making terrorism more public.They are radical losers! Every one of them.

Feb 26, 2012 9:42am EST  --  Report as abuse
sawransky wrote:
Its time to leave already. Troops come home.

Feb 26, 2012 9:49am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.