Analysis: U.S. factory jobs rebound seen destined to fizzle

Sun Feb 26, 2012 5:21pm EST

U.S. President Barack Obama holds up a padlock alongside Master Lock's Senior Vice President Bob Rice as Obama tours the factory in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, February 15, 2012. REUTERS/Jason Reed

U.S. President Barack Obama holds up a padlock alongside Master Lock's Senior Vice President Bob Rice as Obama tours the factory in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, February 15, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed

(Reuters) - U.S. manufacturers are hiring at the fastest pace in more than a decade to keep up with new orders but sweeping technological advances could cost thousands of factory workers their jobs in years to come.

At a new factory in upstate New York, which is due to churn out its first computer chips this year, technicians are calibrating robots to ferry material from machine to machine using miles of overhead track.

"This factory is designed to be fully automated, meaning theoretically it requires no human intervention at all," said Eric Choh, general manager at the facility run by semiconductor maker GlobalFoundries.

The company is hiring engineers and programmers who are still needed to mind the machines. But "compared to 20 years ago, today we don't need a lot of labor," said Choh.

Last year, factories added 237,000 jobs - the most since 1997 - and that burst in hiring is seen stretching into this year as the economy recovers from the 2007-09 recession.

But a renaissance for industrial employment is unlikely. Over the long term, factory job creation looks destined to stagnate as technology advances, and manufacturers' role in the labor market will likely continue a decades-long decline.

A Labor Department report published on February 1 projected factory employment will drop to 11.5 million workers by 2020 - down from 11.9 million in January - despite expectations production will increase in coming years.

The projected decline in employment suggests it will be hard for President Barack Obama and Republican presidential candidates like Rick Santorum to protect factory jobs as ardently as they have promised on the campaign trail.

Factories have a special place in American hearts because they have been the gateway to the middle class for millions of workers.

Even though the United States remains a pre-eminent manufacturing power, accounting for about a fifth of global factory output, only 9 percent of its workforce is engaged in factory activity, and that percentage is falling.

Manufacturers' share of the labor market will likely drop to 7 percent by the end of the decade, according to the government projections, down from nearly a third in the 1950s when unskilled workers played a bigger role.

"You just don't need as many people as in the days when you were essentially running a Ford assembly line," said James Franklin, a Labor Department economist who helped draw up the long-term employment projections.


Graphic on U.S. manufacturing:



The outlook is more positive in the near-term. At GlobalFoundries' sprawling new plant in Saratoga County, for example, Choh plans to hire about 500 more people by year's end.

And across the country, factory payrolls will likely swell by 173,000 this year, says the Manufacturers Alliance for Productivity and Innovation, an industry research group.

Last month, Daimler Trucks announced it would hire 1,200 new workers at a North Carolina plant that makes long-haul trucks that sell well in Australia and South Africa.

But analysts say much of the recent hiring spurt is just a temporary rebound from the recession, when manufacturing output fell about 20 percent and factories laid off 2 million people.

"They probably got rid of more capacity and more employees than was necessary in retrospect," said MAPI economist Cliff Waldman, who expects factory hiring to slow sharply next year.

Still, there are factors supporting the sector.

The U.S. dollar has lost about a third of its value since 2001, helping exporters, and U.S. producers have become more competitive.

After a decade of heightened competition with China, which devastated American industries like clothing makers, the U.S. factories that remain are more high-tech and less likely to be undercut on labor costs.

Moreover, wages in China are rising much faster than in the United States, reducing the incentive to offshore production, while the recession itself raised pressure on U.S. companies to embrace more cost-saving measures, like automation.

S & S Hinge Company, for example, has retooled its plant in Bloomingdale, Illinois, since the recession. A pair of computers runs its newest production line, which makes hinges 50 percent faster than older lines. That is helping the firm meet rising orders for parts that go into pickup truck toolboxes while reducing the need for more staff.

"We've upgraded our factory. We actually put in a new operating system. So it has cut the need for more bodies," said Richard Sade, the company's chief operating officer.


As grim as that sounds for many workers, a future with fewer factory jobs isn't necessarily bad for the economy.

Part of the drive to be more efficient has led factories to outsource more work, contracting services from accounting firms, consultancies and other companies.

Even though the number of workers in U.S. factories today is roughly the same as 70 years ago, jobs in business services, a sector that includes many people working indirectly for manufacturers, have grown eight-fold. The Labor Department expects business services will be one of the top job-creating industries in coming years.

That makes plans by Obama to give manufacturers special treatment - or to penalize them for offshoring jobs - wrongheaded, says Jagdish Bhagwati, an economist at Columbia University.

Obama last week proposed new tax breaks for manufacturers, but many economists view the decline in factory employment as a normal part of the economy's development.

"New jobs in services constantly emerge from manufacturing," Bhagwati said.

(Reporting by Jason Lange from Washington; Editing by Diane Craft)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (9)
txgadfly wrote:
Just knock the dollar down another 10% over the coming year and watch the jobs keep coming back.

Overpricing American goods and labor has caused untold damage to the country. The dollar should be priced to make the majority of corporate facility relocations to foreign lands unprofitable. When they are losing money on the jobs they shipped overseas, then the dollar will be close to its true value. And we can all cry in our beer about their new difficulties, just as they sympathized with our unemployment woes. WAAAAA!

Feb 26, 2012 4:41pm EST  --  Report as abuse
peut wrote:
Outsourcing in the services industry is at least as large a problem.

As a lot of big corporates polish up their profit and loss balance
by showing they save on labor costs, they do not account for the
stagnation and general demotivation within their companies.

Outsourcing of this kind of labor generally tends to stop any innovation by formalizing inefficient working methods. This
hidden brake on development and innovation of their companies will only show up after a few years as disappointing results and a weakened
market position.

So, what is done about that?

Feb 26, 2012 5:33pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Jeepgirl wrote:
txgadfly – Knocking the dollar down raises the price of gasoline and fuels for Americans. It also increases inflation. I do not see that causing jobs to come back. America just needs to become more innovative and intelligent on gathering and using our own resources.

We need to clean up our own back yard, make the best of the best here in the United States and quit shipping our technologies out of the country. Let them make their own inferior copies.

Make the United States #1 again.

In my honest opinion, only.

Feb 26, 2012 6:41pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.