Recreational marijuana measure makes Colorado ballot

DENVER Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:44am EST

A young cannabis plant at grows at The Joint Cooperative in Seattle, Washington January 27, 2012.  REUTERS/Cliff DesPeaux

A young cannabis plant at grows at The Joint Cooperative in Seattle, Washington January 27, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Cliff DesPeaux

DENVER (Reuters) - Colorado voters will be asked to decide whether to legalize the recreational use of marijuana in a November ballot measure, setting up a potential showdown with the federal government over America's most commonly used illicit drug.

The measure, which would legalize possession of small amounts of marijuana by adults, is one of two that will go to voters in November after a Washington state initiative to legalize pot earned enough signatures last month to qualify for the ballot there.

No states currently allow marijuana for recreational use, and California voters turned back a ballot initiative to legalize the drug for such use in 2010, in part because of concerns about how production and sale of the drug would be regulated.

"This could be a watershed year in the decades-long struggle to end marijuana prohibition in this country," Art Way, Colorado manager of the Drug Policy Alliance, said in a statement. The Alliance supports the initiative.

"Marijuana prohibition is counterproductive to the health and public safety of our communities. It fuels a massive, increasingly brutal underground economy, wastes billions of dollars in scarce law enforcement resources, and makes criminals out of millions of otherwise law-abiding citizens."

Colorado is one of 16 states along with Washington, D.C. that already allow marijuana use for medical purposes even as cannabis remains classified as an illegal narcotic under federal law. Public opinion is sharply divided on the merits of full legalization.

The U.S. Justice Department has cracked down on medical cannabis operations in several mostly Western states including Colorado and Washington, raiding dispensaries and growing operations and threatening landlords with prosecution.

A spokesman for Colorado Attorney General John Suthers said on Monday the office opposed the legalization proposal.

"The attorney general will oppose any measure that makes marijuana more accessible," spokesman Mike Saccone said.

The Colorado measure, if approved by voters, would legalize possession of up to an ounce of marijuana or up to six plants for cultivation, said Mason Tvert, co-founder of the Campaign to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol.

It would also set up a regulatory framework for the sale of cannabis products and the application of sales and excise taxes, in addition to legalizing the cultivation of industrial hemp.

WOULD EARMARK TAX REVENUE FOR SCHOOLS

A provision of the measure would also annually earmark the first $40 million in tax revenue generated from pot sales to fund public school construction, Tvert said, although he could not estimate how many tax dollars would be generated.

Any remaining money over $40 million would go to the state's general fund, he said.

Colorado voters rejected a measure to legalize small amounts of cannabis in 2006, but Tvert said the new proposal with its taxing provision, and potential jobs created through the marijuana industry and peripheral businesses, would make it more palatable to voters.

"The time is right," he said, citing a December poll by Public Policy Polling that showed 49 percent of Colorado voters now supported legalization.

Nationwide, an October 2011 Gallup Poll found a record 50 percent of Americans supported legalizing marijuana use, up from 36 percent five years earlier.

Under a medical marijuana law enacted in 2000, Colorado maintains a registry of more than 80,000 card-carrying patients and rules governing how physicians and distributors operate.

But federal prosecutors launched a crackdown last month against nearly two dozen medical marijuana dispensaries located within 1,000 feet (300 metres) of schools, giving proprietors 45 days to cease operations or face civil and criminal penalties. That deadline lapsed on Monday.

(Writing by Steve Gorman; Editing by Dan Whitcomb and Peter Cooney)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
powertopeople wrote:
Too many of our future young leaders (Obama is now one of them)will face prison or felony charges that will wreck their lives and their careers, put them in private corporate prisons that are now lobbying heavily for tougher penalties in order to fill their bed quotas so that they can reap more money from the feds, and disenfranchise them economically and as American citizens. States have to take the lead on this and make these measures at least minor offenses or local ordinance and under local control, not at the state or federal level. Its time to protect our youth from the prison state we have become due to creed of Corporate takeover of our prison system that makes prisoners for life.

Feb 28, 2012 12:15pm EST  --  Report as abuse
CO_Buddyboy wrote:
“”The time is right,” he said, citing a December poll by Public Policy Polling that showed 49 percent of Colorado voters now supported legalization.”

This initiative is NOT legalization. Unfortunately this initiative is law enforcement’s wet dream… Officers would still be able to break down your door and see if you have more than one ounce of this terrible substance. It also creates the crime of driving under the influence of marijuana. If you think that is okay, then I guess the sponsors got it right. If you’re looking for a “true” legalization initiative, go to www.legalize2012.com.

Feb 28, 2012 12:32pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Parent wrote:
Jesus said to do unto others as we would have them to do unto us. None of us would want our child or grandchild thrown in jail with the sexual predators over marijuana. None of us would want to see an older family members home confiscated and sold by the police for growing a couple of marijuana plants for their aches and pains.
If the people who want to use marijuana could grow a few plants in their own back yards, it would be about as valuable as home-grown tomatoes; it would put the drug gangs out of business and get them out of our neighborhoods.

Feb 28, 2012 12:32pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.