Obama lays out detention rules for al Qaeda suspects

WASHINGTON Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:09pm EST

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama issued a policy directive on Tuesday making clear that not all al Qaeda suspects would be held in U.S. military custody, fleshing out exceptions allowed under a sweeping defense bill that sought to have the Pentagon prosecute most suspects.

Under the directive, al Qaeda suspects arrested by U.S. law enforcement for waging attacks against American interests would not necessarily be held by the Pentagon under several scenarios, including if foreign governments refuse to hand them over to U.S. military control.

Other exceptions would include if the person were a U.S. permanent legal resident or if transferring them to military custody would hurt the chances of obtaining a confession or cooperation from the terrorism suspect.

"A rigid, inflexible requirement to place suspected terrorists into military custody would undermine the national security interests of the United States, compromising our ability to collect intelligence and to incapacitate dangerous individuals," Obama said in the directive.

The White House said the rules made sure that an al Qaeda suspect "will be transferred from civilian to military custody only after a thorough evaluation of all of the relevant facts, based on the considered judgment of the president's senior national security team."

Obama's administration has struggled over the best venue for prosecuting terrorism suspects, largely preferring criminal courts over military tribunals that Republicans and even some of the president's fellow Democrats have sought.

Tuesday's directive addresses White House concerns with the National Defense Authorization Act that Obama signed into law at the end of 2011.

SENATE HEARING

The White House had raised concerns the bill could unduly broaden the armed forces' powers over suspected militants, requiring foreigners allied with al Qaeda to be held in military custody even if they were captured in the United States.

That would allow terrorism suspects to be kept in military custody indefinitely without trial. U.S. citizens were already exempted from the mandatory military detention requirement.

The final version of the bill that cleared Congress gave Obama the flexibility to waive certain provisions and to let him determine who would be held by the U.S. military.

Three Republican senators - John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire - issued a joint statement citing "significant concerns" about Obama's waivers, saying they would require a hearing in the Senate Armed Services Committee.

"We are particularly concerned that some of these regulations may contradict the intent of the detainee provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act passed by Congress last year," they said.

An Obama administration official said there should be no surprises in the expanded detention policy.

"The waiver authority and implementing procedures were specifically called for by those who spearheaded the legislation," said the official. "Today's directive merely creates the implementing procedures required under the legislation."

The president's directive also gave the attorney general permission to make additional waivers on a case-by-case basis in consultation with other national security officials.

Other categories in which al Qaeda terrorism suspects would escape U.S. military custody under Obama's waivers include if it would hurt counterterrorism cooperation with another country. The directive would also waive military custody for individuals arrested in the United States on charges unrelated to terrorism and when the person was arrested by local or state authorities.

(Editing by Cynthia Osterman and Christopher Wilson)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
FrankTrades wrote:
I understand a massively expensive ($250,000?) soccer field is being built at Guantanamo for inmates — at us taxpayer expense.

Feb 29, 2012 12:12pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.