Disney disputes shareholder report on CEO pay, role

LOS ANGELES Thu Mar 1, 2012 5:35pm EST

Walt Disney Company President and CEO Bob Iger arrives at the 82nd Academy Awards in Hollywood March 7, 2010. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

Walt Disney Company President and CEO Bob Iger arrives at the 82nd Academy Awards in Hollywood March 7, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Lucas Jackson


Brangelina wed

Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt get married.   Slideshow 

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Walt Disney Co (DIS.N) defended its executive structure and pay on Thursday after a shareholder governance group criticized Chief Executive Bob Iger's compensation and his added role as chairman.

Disney, in filings with securities regulators, said a report by Institutional Shareholder Services was "deeply flawed and out of touch with shareholder interests."

The entertainment and theme-park company said in October that Iger would remain CEO through March 2015 and take on the additional role of chairman at the company's annual meeting this month.

ISS, in its report, said Disney had "reversed an earlier commitment to independent board leadership without transparency or shareholder input." The group said the company's move was "an about-face" from reforms adopted after some shareholders objected in 2004 to former CEO Michael Eisner also holding the chairman's job.

Disney said it made no such commitment. "The board specifically limited its commitment to a post-decision explanation", Disney said on Thursday, adding it had also promised to name a lead independent director.

The company said the idea of extending Iger's term and having him serve as chairman was "initiated by the board and not by Mr. Iger." The board acted to "secure Mr. Iger's leadership through his expected retirement in 2016 to provide for an effective, seamless succession," the company said.

On pay, ISS urged shareholders to oppose Iger's compensation in a non-binding vote.

ISS said Iger's pay "has risen sharply over the past five years despite lackluster shareholder returns" and ranked "among the highest in the S&P 500."

Disney countered that the company had delivered "exceptional total shareholder return" during Iger's six years in the company's top job starting in October 2005.

Shares of Disney rose about 57 percent from October 1, 2005, through the end of 2011. The S&P 500, by comparison, inched up 1.4 percent over the same period.

Disney said Iger's pay was in line with that of media industry peers. His total compensation rose 13 percent in fiscal 2011 to $33.4 million in the 12 months to September.

For their most recently reported fiscal years, Viacom (VIAB.O) CEO Philippe Dauman's earned $43.1 million while News Corp (NWSA.O) Chairman and CEO Rupert Murdoch collected $33.3 million. Time Warner (TWX.N) CEO Jeff Bewkes earned $26.3 million in 2010.

Last year, ISS objected to Disney agreements to pay taxes on any severance packages for some executives if they lost their jobs following a sale or merger of the company. Disney dropped those provisions.

(Reporting By Lisa Richwine; Editing by Gerald E. McCormick and Steve Orlofsky)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (10)
FloDiBona wrote:
Did Disney lawyers really file this with a straight face???!!! BOB IGER MUST GO!!! A $58,000,000 a year compensation package, especially in this economy, is obscene. People are struggling to pay for food, homes, health care, and Mr Iger receives a 13% increase!!!??? BRAVO TO THE ISS!!!

Mar 01, 2012 6:47pm EST  --  Report as abuse
SteveO10 wrote:
This man has done nothing but take part in destroying a network. So give him a raise!!! I think not. There are people who have no jobs and are losing their homes and he needs MORE money!! He has to go!

Mar 01, 2012 7:39pm EST  --  Report as abuse
DeirdreR wrote:
Agreed. Why should Iger get this kind of money? ABC, which is owned by Disney, claimed they couldn’t afford to keep shows like All My Children and One Life to Live on the air because they were too costly. And yet, if they give one man such a large salary, how could they possibly have money to spend on anything else, such as programming that their viewers will actually watch? The new show The Revolution has lost 50% of the viewers already!!! Something is really fishy here.

Mar 01, 2012 8:06pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.