Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Netanyahu warns against diplomatic path with Iran

Related Topics

OTTAWA | Fri Mar 2, 2012 3:18pm EST

OTTAWA (Reuters) - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Friday global powers would be falling into a trap if they pursued talks with Iran and he challenged Tehran with a series of demands before he meets U.S. President Barack Obama.

But at the same time, Netanyahu was careful at a news conference with Canada's leader to avoid widening a rift with Obama over what Washington fears could be an Israeli rush to attack Iranian nuclear facilities before economic sanctions and diplomacy run their course.

Israel, Netanyahu said, has not set nor does it intend to set red lines for the United States in preventing Iran from using its uranium enrichment program to obtain nuclear weapons.

Facing sanctions that could cripple its oil exports, Iran said last month it wanted to resume talks on its nuclear program, negotiations frozen since January last year. But six big powers, represented by EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, have yet to respond to the offer.

"It (Iran) could do again what it has done before, it could pursue or exploit the talks as they've done in the past to deceive and delay so that they can continue to advance their nuclear program and get to the nuclear finish line by running up the clock, so to speak," Netanyahu said.

"I think the international community should not fall into this trap," he told reporters, with Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, a staunch ally of Israel, at his side.

A report by the IAEA last week said Iran was significantly stepping up uranium enrichment, a finding that sent oil prices higher on fears tensions between Tehran and the West could escalate into military conflict.

In some of his strongest comments yet on Iran, Obama said in an interview published on Friday that "all options are on the table" for dealing with Iran's nuclear plans and added that the final option was the "military component."

Setting what a spokesman for Netanyahu called new benchmarks, the Israeli leader demanded Iran dismantle an underground nuclear facility near the city of Qom, stop uranium enrichment and remove all uranium enriched above 3.5 percent from the country.

Israel fears the Fordow enrichment site, in a mountain outside Qom, would create "a zone of immunity" from Israeli air strikes.

Iran two years ago started refining uranium to a fissile concentration of 20 percent at another more vulnerable site, Natanz -- far more than the 3.5 percent level usually required to power nuclear energy plants.

Tehran says it will use 20 percent-enriched uranium to convert into fuel for a research reactor making isotopes to treat cancer patients, but Western officials say they doubt that the country has the technical capability to do that.

Nuclear bombs require uranium enriched to 90 percent, but Western experts say much of the effort required to get there is already achieved once it reaches 20 percent concentration, shortening the time needed for any nuclear weapons "break-out."

(Reporting by Jeffrey Heller, David Ljunggren and Randall Palmer; Editing by Anthony Boadle)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
ToddShishler wrote:
Ayatollah Netanyahu,

Please understand that I say this with the up most respect due to your station. I must humbly beseech your blessed lordship to do try to show some restraint in your comments to EU/American citizenry.

Ayatollah Cameron and Ayatollah Obama can be trusted to do minor tasks, but we run into a bit of risk of a EU/American public backlash if they ever tire of us threatening to liquidate the Persians and send oil prices up $200/barrel.

Further more, until our media lemmings formulate an acceptable “spin” for our precarious “settlement” activities in the West Bank, Gaza, etc.. we should exercise a bit more caution. Especially when it comes to human rights abuses and such (antisemitism accusations are only a temporary solution, nor an actual defense).

Rememeber, If the Americans or Europeans ever became so bold, they could just as easily sanction us for our “abuses” instead of the Muslims. Do promise me your wise magnanimousness, that you’ll consider this lowly servants ramblings.

Virtual pinky-ring kisses,
T.S.

Mar 02, 2012 3:16pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Saint999 wrote:
The only nations we won’t attack are nuclear armed nations: Pakistan, North Korea, etc. Ghaddafi gave up his nuclear ambitions – how well did that work out for him? Iran will work to get nuclear armaments by any and all means. They see the lack of nukes as an existential threat and recent history supports that. They’ve also experienced US coups like the one that put the Shah in charge and experienced Israeli attacks on their first reactor. The more Israel threatens, the more they “know” they must have nukes.

Funny, you’d think Israel would understand the effect of existential threats. Look at the changes it’s brought about in Israel.

Mar 02, 2012 3:49pm EST  --  Report as abuse
BCerentano wrote:
@Saint999…

Then Iran shouldn’t have signed the NPT.

Mar 03, 2012 11:24am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.