Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Tornado chasers

Storm chasers brave danger and debris as they try to capture photos of tornadoes' destructive power.  Slideshow 

Photo

Running while blind

Blind or visually impaired students compete in blind track and field tournament.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Gorilla genome sheds new light on human evolution

Related Topics

A mountain gorilla, a member of the Mubare gorilla group, searches for food in the Bwindi Impenetrable Forest in Uganda July 2, 2009. Picture taken July 2, 2009.   REUTERS/Molly Riley

A mountain gorilla, a member of the Mubare gorilla group, searches for food in the Bwindi Impenetrable Forest in Uganda July 2, 2009. Picture taken July 2, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Molly Riley

LONDON | Wed Mar 7, 2012 1:20pm EST

LONDON (Reuters) - Scientists have sequenced the genome of the gorilla, the last great ape to have its genes decoded, and say it gives new insights into differences between the apes and humans - including their ability to produce competitive sperm.

While confirming that our closest relative is the chimpanzee, the research also shows that around 15 percent of the human gene map resembles the gorilla more closely than it does the chimpanzee genome.

Chris Tyler-Smith, who worked with a team of scientists who presented their findings in a telephone briefing, said that while many human genes are similar to the gorilla versions, it is the ones that differ that are often most intriguing.

One difference that stuck out was in the genes involved in sperm production, he said.

"Gorillas live in groups with one male and lots of females, so there's not much opportunity for sperm competition," he explained. "It was interesting for us to see that some genes involved in sperm formation...had either become inactive in gorillas or had decreased in copy number."

The study was published in the journal Nature on Wednesday.

Gorillas survive in just a few isolated and endangered populations in the equatorial forests of central Africa. There are two distinct species, one known as the eastern lowland and mountain gorillas, and the other known as western lowland and cross river gorillas.

The team used DNA from a western lowland gorilla, named Kamilah, to assemble a gorilla genome sequence and then compared it with the gene maps of the other great apes.

They also sampled DNA sequences from other gorillas so they could explore genetic differences between gorilla species.

"The gorilla genome is important because it tells us about that crucial time when we were diverging from are closest evolutionary cousins," said Aylwyn Scally of Britain's Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, who led the research team.

The human genome project was completed in 2003, while the chimpanzee gene map was published in 2005 and the orangutan genome was completed in 2011.

"Comparisons between these can help us explore the origins of humans when we separated from the great ape species in Africa between 6 and 10 million years ago," said Richard Durbin, who also worked on the study at the Sanger Institute.

The team searched more than 11,000 genes in human, chimpanzee and gorilla for genetic changes important in evolution. They found as expected that humans and chimpanzees are genetically closest to each other over most of the genome, but they found many places where this is not the case.

In all three species, genes relating to sensory perception, hearing and brain development showed accelerated evolution, the researchers said, particularly in humans and gorillas.

The team found that divergence of gorillas from humans and chimpanzees happened around ten million years ago, but the split between eastern and western gorillas was much more recent and more gradual. They compared this split to the one between chimpanzees and bonobos, or modern humans and Neanderthals.

(Reporting by Kate Kelland, editing by Paul Casciato)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
gregbrew56 wrote:
Uh oh, Reuters used that dirty word in an article title again: Evolution.

Bring on the zealots!

Mar 07, 2012 8:34pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Norky51 wrote:
According to this article we separated from the apes some millions years ago. How that separation happened. Did we walk away form the other apes? Was there a spontaneous genetical mutation that make us humans? Why after million of years some apes have evolved into more like humans? Why human have not evolved into super humans?

Mar 07, 2012 11:06pm EST  --  Report as abuse
cb111 wrote:
@Norky51… You misunderstand the way it works. We didn’t evolve from apes… apes and humans evolved from a common ancestor. Some of those groups evolved to become gorillas, some of those groups evolved to become chimps and some of those groups evolved to become humans. Evolution happens at a slow pace over long periods of time so the group that evolved into humans were ‘isolated’ sort of speak from the rest of the population which allowed them to develop their own unique features until they finally evolved into humans we know today.

If you were to take two groups of current humans and completely isolate them in different parts of the world for a very long time, chances are in a million years you would have two distinct species.

Mar 09, 2012 12:42am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.