Senate Democrat offers ban on Keystone oil for highway bill

WASHINGTON Wed Mar 7, 2012 6:30pm EST

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Democratic U.S. senator offered a proposal to ban exports of oil from the Keystone XL crude pipeline from Canada and require American iron and steel be used to build it, part of an effort to derail a Republican plan that would fast-track the project.

Senator Ron Wyden filed the draft amendment to the Senate's highway funding bill to counter a Republican amendment that would see Congress approve TransCanada's $7 billion pipeline.

President Barack Obama has delayed the pipeline, insisting it needs more environmental review.

If the dueling amendments get time on the Senate floor - something which is not yet guaranteed - both of them would have a difficult time attracting enough votes to pass.

But the measures would give Republicans a new chance to highlight how Obama delayed a plan to bring more Canadian oil to the United States while gasoline prices are surging - and give Democrats an opportunity to highlight why they don't believe the pipeline would make a difference to U.S. energy security.

A similar proposal for a ban on oil exports failed in the House, where Republicans have already passed a bill that would grant the pipeline a permit.

In the meantime, TransCanada Corp has said it will split the $7 billion project in two and build the southern leg between the Cushing, Oklahoma storage hub and Texas refineries.

(Reporting by Roberta Rampton; editing by Todd Eastham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
kafantaris wrote:
The Wyden Amendment makes sense. We are the ones taking a risk of an oil spill in our homeland from the Keystone XL Pipeline, so all the oil it transports should stay here. And the pipeline should be built and maintained by American workers — with American made materials.
Otherwise, we would be relegating our land to be a 30 year stepping stone for Canada to transport its dirty oil to foreign markets.
Moreover, the Wyden Amendment should be used as a model for all offshore and public land drilling. If our country incurs the long term risk of a spill, then it should also get the maximum benefit.
The “free market” will have to take a back seat on this one.
Our environment ain’t free — even to the free market.

Mar 10, 2012 1:08am EST  --  Report as abuse
SalomonWisdom wrote:
We have the people, knowledge, and raw materials. I like the idea to manufacture in USA.

Mar 12, 2012 6:26pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.