Obama mulls giving Moscow data on missile defense

WASHINGTON, March 6 Tue Mar 6, 2012 7:56pm EST

WASHINGTON, March 6 (Reuters) - The Obama administration disclosed on Tuesday that it is considering sharing some classified U.S. data as part of an effort to allay Russian concerns about a controversial antimissile shield.

The administration is continuing negotiations begun under former President George W. Bush on a defense technical cooperation agreement with Moscow that could include limited classified data, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Brad Roberts told a House of Representatives' Armed Services subcommittee.

He gave no details on the sort of data that might be shared under such an agreement.

Russia strongly opposes the U.S.-engineered bulwark being built in and around Europe against ballistic missiles that could be fired by countries like Iran.

Moscow fears that such a shield could grow strong enough over time to undermine Moscow's own nuclear deterrent force and has threatened to deploy missiles of its own as a counter.

"We're not the first administration to seek coooperation on missile defense," Roberts, who is responsible for nuclear and missile defense policy, told the subcommittee on strategic forces.

Nor is the administration the first "to believe that cooperation could be well-served by some limited sharing of classified information of a certain kind if the proper rules were in place to do that," he said in reply to questions from Mo Brooks, an Alabama Republican.

"The Bush administration headed down precisely the same path," Roberts said.

"We're making no progress" in persuading Russia to drop its opposition, despite the willingness to consider sharing certain sensitive data, he added.

The Obama administration is pursuing this cooperation because it would be in the security interests of the United States, NATO and Russia by strengthening the defensive capabilities of both NATO and Russia, Roberts said.

Under any such agreement, NATO would be responsible for the defense of its member states and Russia would be responsible for the defense of Russia, Roberts added in written testimony.

Army Lieutenant General Patrick O'Reilly, the head of the Pentagon's Missile Defense Agency, said he had no knowledge of any move to share with Moscow any classified information on the U.S. technology used to knock out target missiles.

"I never received a request to release classified information to the Russians," he told the panel, testifying alongside Roberts.

Panel chairman Michael Turner said last November that he would oppose any Obama administration effort to provide Russia information on the so-called burnout velocity of Raytheon Co Standard Missile-3 interceptors, a key part of the layered defense.

"The House Armed Services Committee will vigorously resist such compromise of U.S. missile defense capabilities," he said in a speech last November.

Republicans who control the panel will back legislation that would bar the administration from transferring classified missile defense technology to Russia as part of any negotiations or for any other purpose, a congressional staff member said.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (81)
Hobobob wrote:
More proof that Obama is trying to destroy America. Perhaps our most important piece of Military Technology, the Missile Shield. This is a completely defensive piece of equipment. The last thing we need to do is give information to Russia where they could possibly render it useless. This would leave all of Europe and the US open to ballistic missiles fired from Russia or N Korea. We’ve got to get rid of this traitor NOW!!!

Mar 06, 2012 8:49pm EST  --  Report as abuse
TimeToReset wrote:
The Russians would NEVER share any of their classified information with us. This is ridiculous. The only other person who ever shared classified information with a rival was Clinton, who gave missile guidance info to China. Obama is using everything at his disposal to dismantle this country. At least the Republicans will block this, unless Obama by-passes Congress (again). At what point will Congress assert it’s proper authority and limit Obama to his proper Executive powers?

Mar 06, 2012 8:54pm EST  --  Report as abuse
maxtor wrote:
do you actually think that Russia would share any of their classified data with us?? think again!! this would probably render our missile shield useless. just another way to destroy this country. doesn’t someone see that besides a few? everyone is fighting with each other and he is going right around and giving this country away. this president will be the undoing of this country. i dont know why anyone would have voted for him anyway. he never told anyone what he was going to do about anything. he beat around the bush and never said anything…his “hope and change”…i am going to change this and that but never said how he was going to change it. dont think it is working out quite like the people of the USA expected and yet there are people following right into his power. what in the hell are you thinking??

Mar 06, 2012 9:12pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

California state worker Albert Jagow (L) goes over his retirement options with Calpers Retirement Program Specialist JeanAnn Kirkpatrick at the Calpers regional office in Sacramento, California October 21, 2009. Calpers, the largest U.S. public pension fund, manages retirement benefits for more than 1.6 million people, with assets comparable in value to the entire GDP of Israel. The Calpers investment portfolio had a historic drop in value, going from a peak of $250 billion in the fall of 2007 to $167 billion in March 2009, a loss of about a third during that period. It is now around $200 billion. REUTERS/Max Whittaker   (UNITED STATES) - RTXPWOZ

How to get out of debt

Financial adviser Eric Brotman offers strategies for cutting debt from student loans and elder care -- and how to avoid money woes in the first place.  Video