Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

New Hampshire House passes birth control exemption

Related Topics

A vendor displays novelty condoms with the likeness of U.S. Republican presidential nominee John McCain (R-Ariz.) and U.S. Democratic presidential nominee Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) during an Obama campaign rally at Bonanza High School in Las Vegas, Nevada October 25, 2008. REUTERS/Steve Marcus (UNITED STATES)

A vendor displays novelty condoms with the likeness of U.S. Republican presidential nominee John McCain (R-Ariz.) and U.S. Democratic presidential nominee Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) during an Obama campaign rally at Bonanza High School in Las Vegas, Nevada October 25, 2008.

Credit: Reuters/Steve Marcus (UNITED STATES)

LITTLETON, New Hampshire | Thu Mar 8, 2012 6:18am EST

LITTLETON, New Hampshire (Reuters) - New Hampshire's Republican-controlled House of Representatives voted on Wednesday to exempt religious institutions from having to include contraceptive coverage in health insurance plans.

The move was the latest in a national effort by Republicans opposed to provisions of President Obama's 2010 national health care reform law that would require all insurance plans -- even those sponsored by religious institutions -- to provide coverage for birth control pills and other contraception for women.

"This stands up for our religious institutions that have long-held principles and teachings under assault," said Representative Pamela Tucker, the deputy speaker of the N.H. House, in a statement.

"Imposing anti-religious regulations on churches achieves no reduction of costs or availability of services, it only serves to please those pushing a political agenda," she said.

The bill now goes to the state's Republican-controlled senate. But if it is passed and sent to Democratic Governor John Lynch it is not clear Lynch will sign it.

New Hampshire and 27 other states currently have laws mandating that insurers cover birth control.

Lynch "believes the current law is working well and serving the people well," said Lynch spokesman Colin Manning, who stopped short of saying the governor would veto the bill.

Dozens of supporters of Planned Parenthood and other women's groups on Wednesday demonstrated outside the capitol in opposition to the bill.

"There is a bit of ideology in wrapping themselves in the cloak of religious liberty to discriminate against women's health," said Jennifer Frizzell, a senior policy adviser for Planned Parenthood's New Hampshire affiliate.

"I'll leave it to voters in New Hampshire to decide whether they support declaring war on contraception and taking away the most commonly used medication for women 18 to 45."

The contraceptive provisions of the federal healthcare law will not be in force until 2014 or later, so even if the current House bill becomes law it would be no more than "temporary," Frizzell said.

Responding to a firestorm of protest from Catholic bishops, Obama last month announced that religiously affiliated employers such as Catholic hospitals and universities would not have to directly fund birth control, saying the onus would instead fall on insurers. But the bishops, evangelicals and Republicans rejected the compromise and have kept fighting the new rule.

On March 1, the Democrat-controlled U.S. Senate narrowly rejected a measure that would have allowed any employer to opt out of birth control coverage and other services on moral grounds.

Just hours before that vote, a Kaiser Family Foundation survey indicated that 63 percent of Americans favored Obama's policy requiring free birth control coverage for female employees, including clear majorities of Roman Catholic, Protestant evangelical and independent voters.

The survey of 1,500 adults showed public opinion breaking more strongly toward party affiliation than gender on contraceptives, with 83 percent of Democrats, 62 percent of independents and 42 percent of Republicans favoring the policy.

(Editing by Greg McCune and Peter Bohan)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (13)
mikefromaz wrote:
Contraceptives huh? Hey Repubs….how about jobs? How about getting rid of tax cuts for the rich? How about backing something useful for a change huh? Using contraceptive and chosing whther you pay for them or not should be a personal ADULT choce. You remember adult choices right? You people wrail and handwring over “big government”, but you have your noses planted in peoples bedrooms just as surely as anyone else. You are against abortion, against contraception. So what is your vision? No ADULT relationships unless they are intended to create new Republicans? Quit pandering for votes, get off your lazy butts and start working on something worthwhile ok? Thank you so much.

Mar 08, 2012 7:27am EST  --  Report as abuse
4ngry4merican wrote:
mikefromaz – +1

Mar 08, 2012 10:53am EST  --  Report as abuse
BobSherman wrote:
The Kaiser Foundation survey mentioned at the end has nothing to do with the issue. Religious Freedom isn’t an opinion survey issue, it’s a right. Many dictators were popularly elected and remained popular while they took measures against religious freedom. President Obama is in good company in this regard. That doesn’t make his actions legal, moral or in keeping with our Constitution.

While they are surveying people, they might want to ask people at the same time why “free” contraception, seems to be more important to the President than breast and prostrate cancer screening.

Mar 08, 2012 11:36am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.