Virginia lawmakers drop home invasion self-defense bill for now

PORTSMOUTH, Virginia Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:23am EST

Workers build a new house in Alexandria, Virginia February 16, 2012. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Workers build a new house in Alexandria, Virginia February 16, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

Related Topics

PORTSMOUTH, Virginia (Reuters) - Virginia lawmakers abandoned efforts on Wednesday to expand the right of homeowners to use deadly force against any intruders amid fierce opposition from critics, but vowed to take the issue up again next year.

The state's Republican-led House of Delegates voted to refer the so-called "castle doctrine" measure, which would protect homeowners who kill trespassers from criminal prosecution, to committee again in the next legislative session.

Republican Delegate Richard P. Bell, a supporter of the change, said the decision to postpone the push came amid fierce opposition from critics.

The measure would have permitted deadly force against any intruder who committed an "overt act" toward the occupant or another person in the dwelling that made the occupant reasonably perceive an imminent danger of bodily injury.

It had passed both the state Senate -- evenly split between Republicans and Democrats -- as well as the Republican-led House. But lawmakers were still debating amendments.

A number of states enacted what became known as "make my day" or "stand your ground" laws in the 1980s, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL).

Laws on self defense, property and premises vary, but most states have some form of legal protection for homeowners, according to an NCSL research paper.

Opponents complained such laws harken back to the so-called "Wild West" when nearly everyone carried a gun, and were unnecessary because those they seek to protect were already protected by common law.

Democratic Delegate Scott Surovell has complained the Virginia measure would turn the state into an uncivilized society. Supporters said the law would simply codified existing case law.

Some states, such as Delaware, permit deadly force in the defense of property even when an occupant is not at risk of being harmed. Under Florida's 2006 law, a person being attacked has no duty to retreat and can return "force with force" with immunity from criminal prosecution.

(Edited by James B. Kelleher and Cynthia Johnston)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
justsayin2011 wrote:
At least now they can die in their own home knowing they are ‘civilized’. I can only imagine the great sense of relief this must provide. Remember, when every second counts, the cops are only minutes away.

Mar 08, 2012 5:54am EST  --  Report as abuse
JamVee wrote:
Every person should be safe from harm in their own home. VA was remiss in listening to their Liberal critics. Everyone should be held harmless, for use of force on a criminal who breaks into their home, even if it is deadly force.

Mar 08, 2012 9:08am EST  --  Report as abuse
AlfredReaud wrote:
“… Opponents complained such laws harken back to the so-called “Wild West” when nearly everyone carried a gun …”

All I can say is nonsense. I live in Colorado, a make-my-day State, which has an affirmative defense to the use of deadly force in the defense of a domicile. There are less breaking and entering or home invasions here than in your neck of the woods, I bet. In Colorado, you take your own life into your hands breaking into somebody’s home. But it’s far from the days of Boot Hill and Dodge City, LOL.

When seconds count, authorities are minutes away. Respect the right to bear arms and to defend your own home against intruders. The legislature should put this up to the vote of the general public. I bet it would get passed…

Mar 08, 2012 9:09am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.