Judge deals setback to Sandusky in child sex abuse case

Tue Mar 13, 2012 4:22pm EDT

1 of 3. Jerry Sandusky, former Penn State defensive coordinator, speaks with the media outside the Centre County Courthouse in Bellefonte, Pennsylvania February 10, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Pat Little

Related Topics

(Reuters) - A lawyer for former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky vowed to seek a dismissal of child sex abuse charges against his client after a judge on Tuesday refused to force prosecutors to provide more details on the allegations.

Judge John Cleland rejected attorney Joe Amendola's request for more information such as exact dates of the purported molestations, details that Amendola said were crucial to building a defense against 52 counts of sexual abuse.

Instead the judge in Pennsylvania's Centre County Court sided with prosecutors, who said they had already extracted as much information as possible from the accusers, described by prosecutor Joe McGettigan as "very troubled children" who were now adults.

"If the victims were capable of providing detail ... we would have done so," McGettigan said.

Several of the accusers allege in court documents the abuse occurred over several years, including one who said it began when he was 8 and lasted six years.

"Any order directing the Commonwealth to supply details would be a futile act since the Commonwealth has explained it cannot supply the details requested," the judge wrote, using Commonwealth to refer to the state.

In response, Amendola said he will seek a dismissal of the charges.

Amendola told reporters on Monday he believed Sandusky's right to due process was being violated.

Sandusky, who has maintained his innocence, is under house arrest. Jury selection in his trial is set to begin in mid-May.

The sex abuse scandal rocked the world of college football and led to the dismissal of Penn State's legendary coach Joe Paterno and University President Graham Spanier.

The university's Board of Trustees said both men showed a "failure of leadership" in not doing more when alerted to suspicions of child sexual abuse by Sandusky.

Paterno, who was head coach at the football powerhouse for 46 years, died of lung cancer in January.

(Editing by Ellen Wulfhorst and Daniel Trotta)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (9)
Sueque wrote:
It’s wrong to charge and convict someone on such meager evidence. Right or wrong this is still America and our accusers still must provide real evidence of breaking the law. Does anyone remember the child care case where the mother and son were accused of molesting children in their care and after literally years all charges were dismissed? It cost the taxpayers millions. They went in with testimony from children who were led in interviews to say what they wanted them to say. The human mind can create false memories and if those memories don’t include dates, details, frequency from these now adults, then I don’t believe them.

Mar 13, 2012 2:27pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
PosterBoiz wrote:
I don’t think 52 counts gives reason to dismiss anything. You can’t expect an abused kid to remember every exact date he was molested. We have eye witness testimony who saw Sandusky and the boy in the shower and Paterno admitted he was told about it. If you see clips of Sandusky on the field with the boys, he touches them on their butts in plain view. What I’ve seen on film is enough to call it inappropriate at the least. It shows what he is capable of. I’m not one to convict without a trial, but he has himself already admitted touching boys and the trial should continue as the judge sees fit.

Mar 13, 2012 2:52pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
apk44 wrote:
also known as being paid off

Mar 13, 2012 3:16pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.