Day in court for healthcare revives public fight

WASHINGTON Wed Mar 14, 2012 6:25pm EDT

Security guards walk the steps of the Supreme Court before Justice Elena Kagan's investiture ceremony in Washington, October 1, 2010. REUTERS/Larry Downing

Security guards walk the steps of the Supreme Court before Justice Elena Kagan's investiture ceremony in Washington, October 1, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Larry Downing


Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The fate of President Barack Obama's healthcare overhaul will be debated at the Supreme Court this month, reviving controversy over his signature domestic policy achievement in a year when Americans vote on whether to give him a second term.

Democrats and Republicans, backers and foes, are spoiling for a battle ahead of the court's six hours of hearings on March 26-28, the most time given to a single topic in 44 years.

While the court's nine justices will rule on the legal issues, probably before July, political rivals and interest groups are seizing the moment to shape public opinion in the run-up to presidential and congressional elections on November 6.

The public relations battle pits the Democratic Obama administration and its allies against a counter-force of Republican lawmakers, conservative pundits, Tea Party activists opposed to big government, and business leaders.

Opinion polls show Americans as divided as ever - with 41 to 47 percent favoring the law and 40 to 45 percent disapproving of it. As might be expected, a majority of Democrats surveyed like it; a majority of Republicans don't.

Union members, mainline religious activists and other advocates of Obama's healthcare law will hold demonstrations near the courthouse on Capitol Hill, where Republicans including Tea Party activists plan rival rallies.


"The larger healthcare reform community is going to be out in force with a simple message: don't take away our healthcare," said Ethan Rome, who heads a coalition of progressive groups and labor unions called Health Care for America Now that has been waging a grass-roots campaign for reform since 2008.

Not to be outdone, Republicans are planning their own assault, including attack videos aimed at voters in battleground states and symbolic legislative action in Congress, on an issue they believe will resonate with key constituencies in the election campaign.

"This is a gift that keeps on giving, politically," said Sean Spicer, the Republican National Committee spokesman. "There'll be a fully coordinated effort targeting families, business owners, you name it."

The White House plans to join the fray with what it calls a public education campaign on healthcare reform, an issue the Obama camp has long seen as resonating with women voters who could prove key in the November election.

Aware of the issue's divisiveness, Obama appears set on leaving the public promotional task largely to lieutenants who will crisscross the country for a week of events culminating with the law's second anniversary on March 23.

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius will lead the charge while Obama appears focused instead on economic issues, jobs and gasoline prices.

For Obama, the healthcare issue could pose serious risks. An aggressive push by the president might help Republicans stir public dissatisfaction about the law just as the high court begins its deliberations.

"He has to make a calculation about whether the law is better served by him not talking about it, than by his talking about it," said Dr. David Blumenthal, a reform advocate who helped lead the administration's healthcare team until 2011.

"It may be the better part of valor to keep healthcare below the radar screen and campaign on economics and the do-nothing Congress," he said.


The 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the most sweeping social legislation in a generation, is intended to extend coverage to more than 30 million uninsured Americans and help rein in costs.

More than half the 50 states, 26 to be precise, and a business group are challenging the law before the Supreme Court, charging that its individual mandate requiring most adults to buy private insurance, and its dramatic expansion of the joint federal-state Medicaid program for the poor, run afoul of the constitutional limits on federal power.

Most of the law's benefits don't kick in until 2014, leaving a vacuum that Republicans have exploited by casting reform as a new $1 trillion expansion of big government that has failed to lower costs or improve access for working families.

The administration has spent months keeping up a steady drum beat of speeches, reports and op-ed articles promoting benefits that millions of Americans already are experiencing, including a ban against coverage denial based on pre-existing conditions and lifetime coverage limits.

Republicans say internal polling shows stark opposition to reform in major electoral battleground states and among powerful constituencies including the elderly, working families and small business owners.

Republican leaders are so confident of their control over the healthcare reform message that they boast of being willing to finance television advertisements for Democratic candidates who want to take credit for the reform law.

"If the president cut an ad saying, 'I want to remind you that I passed Obamacare,' I think we would highly consider paying for that ad," said Spicer.

(Editing by Howard Goller and Xavier Briand)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (16)
NewsDebbie wrote:
After John Roberts Citizen United ruling I have zero faith in the US Supreme Court. It would be easier and cheaper in the long run to just ask Cheney, Rove, Big Oil and Big Insurance what do you want, how do you want it, and save what once was a representative democratic republic a lot of time and money. We are a monied plutocracy.

Mar 14, 2012 7:59pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
fromthecenter wrote:
Are you referring to the checks that have been written to the judges and politicians to protect the insurance industry and their accomplices that make healthcare in this country a luxury? I will never understand how so many people would want to fight for a system that is this expensive and that causes millions upon millions of their fellow citizens to do without.

Mar 14, 2012 9:19pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
umojaresearch wrote:
The real problem with the Health Care battle is, the public is never really given the real Truth about Health Care, or given meaningful choices. We are generally led to believe we are loosing health benefits and people react to any supposed loss.

One of the real problems is choice when we are not allowed to choose the type of Medical Care and this is because what they are pushing is drugs and other allopathic means of treatment, or supposed cure. Those who wish to gravitate towards Holistic remedies and treatment really are not guaranteed that choice.

It’s really a battle for the money available for drugs and treatment which has failed humanity for decades.

U.S. Citizens rarely hear about, or have access to the Holistic Medical Practices which have cured many diseases such as Cancer and AIDS/HIV, simply because these remedies are natural and can not be patented.

To Your Good Health,


Dr. Royal R. Rife (Cured Al Known and unknown diseases)
Dr. Max Gerson (Cured Cancer)
Dr. William F. Koch (Cured Cancer)
Dr. Gaston Naessens (Cancer & AIDS Cure)
Mother Nature supplier of herbs and other natural remedies

Mar 14, 2012 10:34pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.