New York cuts pension benefits for public workers

Thu Mar 15, 2012 3:14pm EDT

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo pauses as he is being applauded before his State of the State address at the Empire State Plaza Convention center in the New York State Capitol complex in Albany, New York, January 5, 2011. REUTERS/Mike Segar

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo pauses as he is being applauded before his State of the State address at the Empire State Plaza Convention center in the New York State Capitol complex in Albany, New York, January 5, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Mike Segar

Related Topics

(Reuters) - New York state lawmakers approved pension reform that will save an estimated $80 billion over 30 years, largely by reducing benefits for newly hired state and local public workers, which union officials Thursday blasted as an attack on the middle class.

Governor Andrew Cuomo praised the bill enacted by the legislature with several others starting late Wednesday as key to maintaining the state's fiscal health. The bill also provides a safeguard for municipalities that will protect them from any financial burden if the state increases their pension benefits.

Spiraling pension obligations are one of the top financial problems faced by state and local governments across the United States. For New York's municipalities, pension costs have risen more than 650 percent since 2002, to $12.2 billion in 2012, Cuomo said.

The new law creates a sixth tier of smaller pension benefits for future state and local public workers. It raises retirement plan contributions by a sliding scale, ranging from 3 percent for employees who earn up to $45,000 a year to 6 percent for those with annual salaries of at least $100,000.

Though the governor wanted to raise the retirement age for civilian workers to 65, the new law only raises it by one year to 63. Workers who retire early will collect pensions that are 6.5 percent lower.

Further, the average salary used to calculate benefits will be the last five years of employment, instead of the last three years. And only $15,000 of a worker's overtime can be used in this calculation, adjusted for inflation.

Cuomo, a Democrat, had repeatedly warned that pension costs could bankrupt local governments if not lowered.

"Without this critical reform, New Yorkers would have seen significant tax increases, as well as layoffs to teachers, firefighters and police," he said in a statement.

Public workers unions decried the new law. "Once again, middle class New Yorkers will pay the price for Wall Street's misdeeds," said AFL-CIO President Mario Cilento.

"Tier 6 is not reform; it is an assault on the long-term economic security of nurses, teachers, firefighters, and other workers," he said, also citing previous layoffs, furloughs, wage freezes and cuts in pension benefits.

The pension bill was enacted with Cuomo's other top priorities, including legalizing casinos, expanding the state's criminal DNA database, and redrawing election districts.

New York state's $140 billion pension fund is exceptional because it is fully funded - unlike Illinois, for example, which has an $83 billion liability.

Yet New York's annual payments are enormous. In 2009, 768,392 residents received a total of $20.5 billion in pension benefits from state and local plans, an average of $2,200 a month, the National Institute on Retirement Security said.

Investment earnings provided 69.9 percent of New York's pension fund receipts, while contributions from employees only provided 6.57 percent between 1993 to 2009, the group said.

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who organized politicians to support the bill, praised its passage.

"Skyrocketing pension costs have caused fiscal crises in many cities and counties around New York, cutting into local governments' ability to deliver core services," said Bloomberg.

Under the bill, the state will have to pay for any increases in pension benefits enacted, instead of forcing counties, cities and towns to pick up the bill.

Bloomberg, an independent, said Albany's past decisions drove the cost of the city's pension contributions to $8 billion in 2012 from $1.5 billion in 2002.

Under the bill, new, non-unionized employees earning at least $75,000 a year for the first time will have the option of selecting a 401(k) defined-benefit thrift plan.

State and local governments grappling with high pension costs also face mounting pressure to lower their expected rates of return on pension fund investments.

This week, the board of California's pension fund, one of the largest in the country, voted to lower its assumed rate of return to 7.5 percent from 7.75 percent.

New York City's actuary has recommended reducing the investment rate of return to 7 percent from 8 percent.

(Additional reporting by Lisa Lambert in Washington, D.C.; Editing by Daniel Trotta, Leslie Adler and James Dalgleish)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (12)
Way to go, Gov! This has to be the fairest compromise in public employment and private employment we have seen yet. It is not weighted heavier on one side at the cost of the other. Wow.

Mar 15, 2012 12:42pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Brent1023 wrote:
Just checking – is there really such a thing as a “401(k) defined-benefit thrift plan” and if so how would that help the city, since only the city could top up such a plan in case the investments failed to yield enough to provide the benefits.

On the plan, vain hope. If the zero interest regime continues for much longer even this change will not be enough to save the billions in unfunded liabilities for all the defined benefit plans out there. Time to face the reality of the current economy and turn off defined benefits.

You can have wall street bankers making billions and unfunded foreign wars, or you can have defined benefit pensions. You cannot have both.

Mar 15, 2012 3:29pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
mkrand01 wrote:
Race to the bottom. Soon there will be no jobs worth doing. I wonder what we are going to do with the retired poor in 2030….

Mar 15, 2012 3:34pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.