U.S. government readies new contraceptives language

WASHINGTON Sat Mar 17, 2012 7:44pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Obama administration on Friday is expected to propose official language laying out its plan to accommodate the moral concerns of religiously affiliated institutions that oppose birth control, according to sources familiar with the matter.

The announcement of a new ¬ďAdvance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking" would not alter President Barack Obama's adopted policy requiring access to free employer-sponsored health insurance coverage for women's contraceptives, the sources said.

But it is expected to outline proposed regulatory language and provide analysis for public comment covering religious institutions that self-insure and other aspects of the accommodation that the White House announced on February 10, according to the sources.

The administration last month adopted a new rule under the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that requires employers to provide coverage with free birth control for women.

Churches and other places of worship are exempt. But the rule currently on the books applies to religiously affiliated hospitals, universities, charities and other institutions.

The policy set off a firestorm among Catholic authorities and other social conservatives, which Obama sought to quell by promising changes that would place the onus of paying for contraceptives coverage on insurers instead of religiously affiliated employers.

Administration officials have said for some time they expected to propose regulatory language articulating the president's compromise.

One source said the issue of self-insured religious institutions was one of the key questions that needed to be addressed.

Word of Friday's expected announcement followed weeks of behind-the-scenes meetings between administration officials and a range of stakeholders including Roman Catholic bishops, who oppose artificial contraception and want the current policy rescinded.

The announcement is likely to be followed by a period of public comment.

The administration's current policy does not come into force for religious employers until August 1, 2013.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Really36 wrote:
Here’s a solution. Stop calling the pills birth control and instead call them what they really are — female hormones. Sure, they’re used to control ovulation, which can prevent pregnancy, but they’re also used to treat a lot of other female problems (i.e. diseases). I began developing one of those problems when I was a teenager. Birth control was the only thing that would’ve regulated my hormones and prevented it from getting worse, but my catholic doctor and mother decided not to put me on it. Now I’m in my late 30′s and have been dealing with infertility treatments for a long, long time. Could’ve been prevented years ago with hormone supplements, but it wasn’t because of the blanket term “birth control” and the stigma surrounding it. I’m technically catholic, but I’m getting really tired of the all-male catholic leadership — that won’t allow women into any high or even semi-high ranks — making tunnel-vision decisions about things like this. And I’m even more angry with the flock-of-sheep women who go along with it!

Mar 20, 2012 4:54pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.