EU considers new controls for shadow banking

BRUSSELS Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:15am EDT

European Union's Internal Market Commissioner Michel Barnier addresses a news conference on the progress of the single market and the 2011 governance check-up report in Brussels February 27, 2012. REUTERS/Yves Herman

European Union's Internal Market Commissioner Michel Barnier addresses a news conference on the progress of the single market and the 2011 governance check-up report in Brussels February 27, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Yves Herman

Related Topics

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The European Commission is widening its regulatory sweep to include "shadow" banking, heralding new controls over the sprawling and largely unchartered 46 trillion euro ($61 trillion) sector blamed for helping trigger the financial crisis.

The EU's executive launched a consultation with industry on Monday with a view to writing rules to control shadow banking, a term describing activity resembling banks' basic borrow-and-lend model, but often taking place beyond the watch of regulators.

It opens up a new front in the regulatory drive of Brussels, which some analysts believe has been slow to tackle the causes of a financial crisis that struck Europe roughly five years ago.

"What we do not want is for financial activities and entities to circumvent existing and foreseen rules, allowing new sources of risk to accumulate in the financial sector," said Michel Barnier, the EU official in charge of regulatory reform.

"That is why we need to better understand what shadow banking actually is and does, and what regulation and supervision may be appropriate."

Political leaders are aware of the potential problem that shadow banking presents and the Group of 20 top global economies have asked their task force, the Financial Stability Board (FSB), to come up with plans to regulate the sector.

That will give a lead to the European authorities in finalizing their plans.

The chairman of Britain's Financial Services Authority, Adair Turner, has called for radical plans to regulate shadow banking, saying last week that the system may be too complex for regulators to understand.

Hedge funds and private equity are often cited as examples of shadow banking. But the term can also take in investment funds and even cash-rich firms that lend government bonds to banks, and which in turn use them as security when taking credit from the European Central Bank.

Shadow banking can also refer to offshore vehicles such as those that banks used before the crisis for leverage, as well as money-market funds taking deposits from companies.


The man credited with coining the term, former PIMCO managing director Paul McCulley, understood it to mean "the whole alphabet soup of levered up non-bank investment conduits, vehicles and structures", such as the special investment vehicles that many blamed for the financial crisis.

The sector, which operates on the fringes of mainstream banking, has more than doubled in size over the past decade and accounted in 2010 for more than a quarter of the total financial system and is half the size of all bank assets.

Many fear that as the regulatory net closes in on banks, activity will migrate into shadow banking, building up new financial bubbles that could burst in the future.

Some parts of shadow banking, such as hedge funds, are already regulated in Europe.

"We need to make sure that those who are involved in bank-like business but are not formally considered to be a bank should operate under the same rules as a bank," Andreas Dombret, the board member in charge of financial stability at Germany's Bundesbank, said in a radio interview.

"The supervision (of shadow banks) needs a very broad catalogue of criteria. The more flexible, the better. This also means that it won't work with a singular assessment."

Any European Union regulation will be cast within the FSB's framework, although there is always scope for Brussels to sharpen certain rules. Difficulty in agreeing an exact definition of the problem, however, may undermine attempts to regulate it.

"Many institutions such as hedge funds act similarly to banks when, for example, they buy corporate bonds or lend to companies using the funds of investors or savers," said Graham Bishop, an expert in EU regulatory policy.

"And they face similar risks, often borrowing on a short-term basis and lending over a longer term, making them vulnerable to short-term funding risks."

The Commission, which writes the first draft of EU laws before seeking the green light from the bloc's 27 member states and the European Parliament, said it was focusing on asset management, securities lending and repurchase agreements, securitization, and other shadow banking entities.

Ultimately, it may be down to national and pan-European regulators to keep tabs on the ever-changing sector. This could prove difficult to agree on with countries such as Britain reluctant to see further powers given to pan-European financial authorities.

"If you seek to define shadow banking, it will migrate to escape regulation," Bishop said. "We need to give regulators more leeway to ask if activities like these are something that poses a risk to the financial system."

($1 = 0.7592 euros)

(Additional reporting by Michelle Martin in London and Eva Kuehnen in Frankfurt; Editing by David Holmes and Rex Merrifield)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
TheUSofA wrote:
Now, just have to find the right Goldman Sachs people or similar, to sit on any proposed regulatory board and all will be well.

Mar 19, 2012 3:30pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
jcfl wrote:
the US shadow banking industry was as big as, or even bigger than, the regulated US banking industry just before our financial collapse. the european equivalent at least is being drawn in to the regulatory process where it belongs. not so in the US, where the gop will continue to fight at all costs any regulation that helps protect our financial structure from further greed and extreme risk taking. in fact the gop wants to remove any regulation – paving the way to another disastrous, and possibly last, US depression.

Mar 19, 2012 4:48pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.