Bloomberg charity adds $220 million to anti-smoking effort

NEW YORK Thu Mar 22, 2012 3:45am EDT

A man discards a cigarette butt after smoking outside a construction site in Central, a business district in Hong Kong in this October 18, 2006 file photograph. REUTERS/Paul Yeung/Files

A man discards a cigarette butt after smoking outside a construction site in Central, a business district in Hong Kong in this October 18, 2006 file photograph.

Credit: Reuters/Paul Yeung/Files

Related Topics


Ebola epidemic

Quarantines and isolation units imposed to stop the spread of the worst Ebola outbreak in history.  Slideshow 

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Michael Bloomberg's charitable foundation will commit $220 million over the next four years to fight tobacco use globally, including for the funding of legal challenges against the industry.

Calling tobacco "a scourge all over the world" and accusing cigarette makers of "nefarious activities," the New York City mayor said at a news conference that his foundation will focus on low and moderate-income countries where nearly 80 percent of smokers live, like Russia, China, India, Indonesia and Bangladesh.

Bloomberg was set to announce the new funding for Bloomberg Philanthropies on Thursday at the 15th World Conference on Tobacco or Health in Singapore. The commitment takes the foundation's total pledge to the cause to almost $600 million.

Smoking could kill about 1 billion people this century, authors of the fourth edition of the Tobacco Atlas said at the book's launch in Singapore on Wednesday. The book is published by the American Cancer Society and World Lung Foundation.

Bloomberg's initiative is likely to face opposition in China, the world's largest producer and consumer of tobacco with more than 300 million smokers, from a powerful state monopoly and local officials who fear a fall in tobacco profits.

The tobacco industry provides nearly one-tenth of tax revenues in China. According to the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, the tobacco tax take in 2011 rose 22.5 per cent to 753 billion yuan ($119.09 billion).

The country's state tobacco monopoly, China National Tobacco Corp, produced profits of 118 billion yuan in 2010.

For years, China has conducted half-hearted campaigns to stub out the habit. Last year, it said it would ban smoking at all indoor public venues, but non-smoking signs are routinely ignored.

Although nearly 1.2 million Chinese people die from smoking-related diseases each year, the habit is considered an important part of socializing and Chinese cigarettes are among the cheapest in the world at less than a dollar a pack.

Tobacco use cost China $28.9 billion in direct medical costs in 2008, more than four times the amount in 2000, Tobacco Atlas says.


The initiative is a departure from Bloomberg's efforts since 2007, which have focused on "what's worked here" in New York City, said Dr. Kelly Henning, director of the charity's public health programs.

That included pressing local and national governments to raise cigarette taxes, persuading the entertainment industry not to film movie stars smoking, making nicotine patches widely available and lobbying for laws that ban tobacco advertising, sponsorship and smoking in public.

Some evidence suggests such strategies have worked. In New York City, the adult smoking rate has dropped to an all-time low of 14 percent, the Health Department said in September. By comparison, the national smoking rate is 19.3 percent, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says.

The New York City example is gaining traction overseas. Earlier this month, India increased its cigarette tax.

"We've been doing tax advocacy in India for the last year and have now seen 12 states raise their state-level value-added tax on cigarettes," said Henning. "This increase is at the national level. We consider it a small step forward."

India banned smoking in public places in 2008, and since last year all smoking scenes in films must be accompanied by an on-screen health warning.

According to an Indian government report, tobacco-related illnesses cost India $6.1 billion in 1999. The government earns about $1.4 billion in excise revenue from tobacco.

Bloomberg Philanthropies' campaign has also led to laws banning smoking in public places in Brazil, Turkey and Pakistan.

Working with ministries of health and non-governmental organizations, the charity has helped win the passage of laws in 11 countries mandating graphic images on cigarette packs. In the United States, the government and tobacco industry are battling in court over whether a similar law is constitutional.


As anti-tobacco policies and laws are extended globally - they currently cover 2.2 billion people - they threaten cigarette makers' profits and the industry is fighting back.

To counter a decline in smoking in the United States, cigarette makers have relied on higher prices, cost cuts and growth in smokeless tobacco to keep profits rising.

They have also targeted overseas markets, especially in China, Indonesia, and Russia, where a growing middle class can pay for branded products.

Tobacco Atlas says the tobacco industry reaped profits of $35 billion in 2010.

Bloomberg Philanthropies helps countries, such as Uruguay, take on tobacco firms.

The South American country adopted a law in 2009 that required warning labels to cover 80 percent of the surface of cigarette packs - the most in the world - and that each brand have only one variant, among other restrictions.

In response, Philip Morris International and three affiliates filed a complaint with the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes, part of the World Bank, alleging that the restrictions harmed business operations and violated a bilateral investment treaty between Uruguay and Switzerland, where two affiliates are based.

Bloomberg is underwriting legal assistance for Uruguay, said Henning. "If industry wins this one, other countries will be terrified of adopting anti-tobacco measures," she said.

($1 = 6.3229 yuan)

(Additional reporting by Sui-Lee Wee in Beijing, Beijing Newsroom, Frank Jack Daniel in New Delhi, Brad Dorfman; Editing by Michele Gershberg and Jonathan Hopfner)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (5)
ALCOHOL55 wrote:
Try adding $ 1 Trillion to an ANTI ALCOHOL Campaign…..It Is The biggest cause of death,disease,rape,child and spousal abuse,suicides,murder.accidents ,For Heavens Sake he should know about that from not only his city but the WHOLE USA That $ 280 Billion a year in costs incurred because of the use of ALCOHOL is 1200% More than And CIGARETTE Costs INCURRED,Look it Up……….

Mar 22, 2012 4:36am EDT  --  Report as abuse
ALCOHOL55 wrote:
3. Heart Disease
Resveratrol, a compound in the skin of red grapes and plentiful in red wine, is associated with a reduced risk of heart disease.

But drink more than the recommended one glass per day and you reverse the heart-healthy benefit.

“Chronic heavy drinking is a leading cause of cardiovascular disease,” Eskapa says.

Excessive drinkers also face:
A higher risk of damaging heart muscle – and that occurs earlier in drinking women than in men
Higher triglyceride (fat) levels in the blood
High blood pressure
Heart failure
Cardiac arrhythmia (irregular heartbeats)
Death from heart attacks
Anemia (a shortage of red blood cells, which carry oxygen to the body)

4. Brain Damage
Women drinkers are more vulnerable to brain damage, Eskapa says.

Long-term alcohol abuse destroys the cerebellum, the brain region responsible for sensory perception, coordination and motor control, according to the Women’s Heart Foundation.

They may face irreversible damage resulting in slowed thinking, an unsteady walk and slurred speech.
“Most alcoholics have some loss of mental function, reduced brain size and changes in the function of the brain cells,” Eskapa says.

5. Violence
Alcohol doesn’t cause violence, but it can make a drunk woman more vulnerable to physical abuse because she can miss danger signs.

“Victimization is really a huge issue for drinking women,” Wilsnack says. “Sexual assault is also a risk.”

And the danger doesn’t disappear when they’re drinking behind closed doors. In research spanning 10 countries, Wilsnack found a consistent link between alcohol and aggression

Mar 22, 2012 4:41am EDT  --  Report as abuse
TaraGreen wrote:
I’m sure this is great news to mothers of hungry children without access to clean water.

Mar 22, 2012 7:58am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.