Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Racial strategy by gay marriage foes draws criticism

Related Topics

Wed Mar 28, 2012 6:19pm EDT

(Reuters) - A confidential memo saying the best way to fight same-sex marriage is to drive "a wedge between gays and blacks" and manipulate Latinos drew criticism on Wednesday in the weeks ahead of a vote to ban gay marriage in North Carolina.

The memo written by the National Organization for Marriage was made public late Monday as part of a lawsuit in Maine, where voters will consider a November referendum to legalize gay marriage.

The previously confidential memo outlined a number of strategies aimed at increasing opposition to gay marriage among Latinos and blacks as a way of undermining the argument that gay rights are equivalent to civil rights. "It's really quite appalling that they would try to divide portions of the country along racial lines," said Stuart Campbell, executive director of Equality North Carolina, a group leading opposition to a May 8 referendum on whether to change the state constitution to ban same-sex marriage.

NAACP President and CEO Benjamin Todd Jealous said in a statement that NOM's plan was rooted in cynicism and predicted it would fail.

"No group, no matter how well funded, can drive an artificial wedge between two communities whose histories are so intertwined. People of color understand what it is like to be the target of discrimination. No public relations strategy will make us forget that," Jealous said.

The memo, discussing NOM's 2008-2009 accomplishments, outlined its strategy for fighting the movement to legalize gay marriage, including one effort called ‘Not a Civil Rights Project.'

"The strategic goal of this project is to drive a wedge between gays and blacks - two key Democratic constituencies," the memo said. "Find, equip, energize and connect African American spokespeople for marriage… provoke the gay marriage base into responding by denouncing these spokesmen and women as bigots."

The memo also discussed efforts to reach out to Hispanics by labeling support for same-sex marriage a concession to ‘Anglo' culture and a plan to get Latino celebrities to do television ads.

"We must interrupt this process of assimilation by making support for marriage a key badge of Latino identity - a symbol of resistance to inappropriate assimilation," the document said. Following the memo's release, NOM issued a statement saying the group has "worked extensively with supporters of traditional marriage from every color, creed and background." Like North Carolina, Minnesota voters will consider a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. Maine's referendum considers whether to allow it.

Same-sex couples can currently marry in the District of Columbia, New York, Iowa and four New England states, including Massachusetts, Connecticut, Vermont and New Hampshire.

Gay marriage laws have also been passed in Washington, effective June 7, and Maryland, effective in January 2013.

(Editing By Barbara Goldberg and Dan Burns)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
gregbrew56 wrote:
Why not? It worked for Prop 8 in CA.

Three cheers for the American Taliban!

Mar 28, 2012 7:23pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
wrpa wrote:
How much money did the Catholic Church steal from hungry kids and give to NOM and its cronies for the 2009 campaign?

Mar 29, 2012 12:19pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.